Journal article

Varying intensity of judicial review: a conceptual analysis

Abstract:: It is generally acknowledged that the intensity of judicial review varies. The first half of this article provides the conceptual architecture of the different factors that shape the intensity of review, drawing on doctrine from UK, US and EU Law. This provides the foundation for the second part of the article, which critiques argumentation concerning variation in proportionality review.

Publication status:: Published

Peer review status:: Peer reviewed

Actions

Email

Email this record

Send the bibliographic details of this record to your email address.

Your Email
Please enter the email address that the record information will be sent to.

-
Your message (optional)
Please add any additional information to be included within the email.
Share
Cite

Cite this record

APA Style

Craig, P. (2022). Varying intensity of judicial review: a conceptual analysis. Public Law, 2022(July), 442–462.

MLA Style

Craig, P. “Varying Intensity of Judicial Review: a Conceptual Analysis.” Public Law, vol. 2022, no. July, 2022, pp. 442–62.

Chicago Style

Craig, P. 2022. “Varying Intensity of Judicial Review: a Conceptual Analysis.” Public Law 2022 (July): 442–62.
Print

Access Document

Files:: Craig_2022_Varying_intensity_judicial.pdf

(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 312.7KB, Terms of use)

Publication website:: https://1.next.westlaw.com/Document/I72D5A560E84E11ECAFFDDB1FD7451E91/View/FullText.html

Authors

+ Craig, P More by this author

Institution:: University of Oxford
Division:: SSD
Department:: Law
Sub department:: Law Faculty
Oxford college:: St John's College
Role:: Author

Publisher:: Sweet and Maxwell
Journal:: Public Law More from this journal
Volume:: 2022
Issue:: July
Pages:: 442-462
Publication date:: 2022-06-20
ISSN:: 0033-3565

Language:: English
Keywords:: burden of proof

review grounds

EU law

FFR

proportionality

standard of proof

comparative law

judicial review

jurisprudence

United States
Pubs id:: 1304540
Local pid:: pubs:1304540
Deposit date:: 2022-12-10
ARK identifier:: ark:/29072/ora_7489ac99c95f4631a3183632ff6ae8d9

Terms of use

Copyright holder:: Sweet and Maxwell
Copyright date:: 2022
Rights statement:: © Sweet and Maxwell 2022.
Notes:: This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in Public Law following peer review. The definitive published version (P.L. 2022, Jul, 442-462) is available online on Westlaw UK.

Licence:: Terms and Conditions of Use for Oxford University Research Archive

Views and Downloads

Views and downloads will return soon

If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP