Journal article icon

Journal article : Review

Differences in recovery time between trapeziectomy and carpometacarpal joint replacement: meta-analysis

Abstract:
Background: Thumb-base osteoarthritis is a common degenerative condition that produces symptoms including pain and reduced hand function. Trapeziectomy is the mainstay surgical intervention following failure of conservative management and steroid injection, with carpometacarpal (CMC) joint replacement anticipating faster recovery time and return to work. However, there is limited evidence on recovery following both surgeries, which affects patient counselling and future research design. Methods: A preregistered (CRD42023450865) systematic review of the literature was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire scores, grip strength, and key pinch strength scores were obtained at different timepoints during follow-up. Standardized mean changes (SMC) were calculated and pooled through random-effects meta-analysis before being plotted at monthly timepoints. Results: Of 63 articles eligible for inclusion, 25 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses were conducted comparing types of trapeziectomy, joint replacement implants, and immobilization protocols. At the 1-month follow-up, joint replacement was associated with a trend of improvement in the DASH score, whereas trapeziectomy was associated with a deterioration. At 12 months, joint replacement showed a trend of greater improvement in hand function than trapeziectomy. Key pinch strength returned to baseline function at 1.5 months after joint replacement, compared with 6 months after trapeziectomy. Newer dual-mobility implants were associated with a quicker trend of recovery in DASH and key pinch strength than single-mobility implants. However, confidence intervals overlapped considerably, and most study arms had a high risk of bias, so these findings should not be considered statistically significant. Conclusion: This study shows a trend towards faster early recovery after CMC joint replacement compared with trapeziectomy, although the evidence remains limited. Randomized clinical trials with systems to frequently capture patient-reported outcomes data are required to study the temporal course of recovery for both surgeries.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1093/bjsopen/zrag040

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0009-0000-9572-1561
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author


Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Journal:
BJS Open More from this journal
Volume:
10
Issue:
2
Article number:
zrag040
Publication date:
2026-04-29
Acceptance date:
2026-03-18
DOI:
EISSN:
2474-9842


Language:
English
Keywords:
Subtype:
Review
Pubs id:
2414282
Local pid:
pubs:2414282
Source identifiers:
3998783
Deposit date:
2026-04-29
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP