Conference item
Rethinking evaluation for temporal link prediction through counterfactual analysis
- Abstract:
- In response to critiques of existing evaluation methods for temporal link prediction (TLP) models, we propose a novel approach to verify if these models truly capture temporal patterns in the data. Our method involves a sanity check formulated as a counterfactual question: ``What if a TLP model is tested on a temporally distorted version of the data instead of the real data?'' Ideally, a TLP model that effectively learns temporal patterns should perform worse on temporally distorted data compared to real data. We analyse this hypothesis and introduce two temporal distortion techniques to assess six well-known TLP models.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Version of record, pdf, 250.4KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publication website:
- https://openreview.net/forum?id=TKydQh6koc
Authors
- Publisher:
- OpenReview
- Publication date:
- 2025-03-05
- Acceptance date:
- 2025-03-05
- Event title:
- I Can't Believe It's Not Better: Challenges in Applied Deep Learning workshop at ICLR 2025
- Event location:
- Singapore
- Event website:
- https://sites.google.com/view/icbinb-2025
- Event start date:
- 2025-04-28
- Event end date:
- 2025-04-28
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
2100720
- Local pid:
-
pubs:2100720
- Deposit date:
-
2025-03-27
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Rahman et al.
- Copyright date:
- 2025
- Rights statement:
- © The Authors 2025.
- Notes:
- This paper was presented at the I Can't Believe It's Not Better: Challenges in Applied Deep Learning workshop at ICLR 2025, 28th April 2025, Singapore.
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record