Journal article
Diakonia and healthcare’s contested social turn
- Abstract:
- The argument is that a revised understanding and practice of diakonia can speak apologetically into the turn to philosophy, the social world and responsiveness to persons within healthcare policy and practice. This turn opens up contested questions about what constitute goodness in healthcare, with practical ramifications for the support of health-related social agency such as that pursued by churches and ecclesial organisations. To address these questions, John N Collins’ work is critically developed by interweaving the political and ecclesial senses of diakonia. The social authority of diakonia proceeds from its commissioned and representative nature and its concomitant eschatological purposiveness and missional logic. Thus conceived the duality of diakonia yields benefits to the conception, preservation and practice of health-related social agency and of ‘service’ more generally. The outcome is an Anglican political theology which can avoid some of the difficulties of German Protestants’ concept and practice of Diakonie¬ and address key issues raised in the others papers in this special section.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 301.8KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1080/1462317X.2019.1695405
Authors
- Publisher:
- Taylor and Francis
- Journal:
- Political Theology More from this journal
- Volume:
- 20
- Issue:
- 8
- Pages:
- 668-683
- Publication date:
- 2019-12-20
- Acceptance date:
- 2019-11-17
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1743-1719
- ISSN:
-
1462-317X
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:1072687
- UUID:
-
uuid:6f98eba8-2c96-43c7-9f34-6658d5f4691c
- Local pid:
-
pubs:1072687
- Source identifiers:
-
1072687
- Deposit date:
-
2019-11-18
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Informa UK Ltd.
- Copyright date:
- 2019
- Rights statement:
- © 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
- Notes:
- This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available online from Taylor and Francis at: https://doi.org/10.1080/1462317X.2019.1695405
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record