Journal article
Learning from England’s best practice tariff: Process measure pay-for-performance can improve hip fracture outcomes
- Abstract:
-
Objective:
The objective of this study was to evaluate England's Best Practice Tariff (BPT) and consider potential implications for Medicare patients should the US adopt a similar plan.
Summary Background Data:
Since the beginning of the Affordable Care Act, Medicare has renewed efforts to improve the outcomes of older adults through introduction of an expanding set of alternative-payment models. Among trauma patients, recommended arrangements met with mixed success given concerns about the heterogeneous nature of trauma patients and resulting outcome variation. A novel approach taken for hip fractures in England could offer a viable alternative.
Methods:
Linear regression, interrupted time-series, difference-in-difference, and counterfactual models of 2000–2016 Medicare (US), HES-APC (England) death certificate-linked claims (≥65y) were used to: track US hip fracture trends, look at changes in English hip fracture trends before-and-after BPT implementation, compare changes in US-versus-English mortality, and estimate total/theoretical lives saved.
Results:
806,036 English and 3,221,109 US hospitalizations were included. Following BPT implementation, England's 30-day mortality decreased by 2.6 percentage-points (95%CI: 1.7–3.5) from a baseline of 9.9% (relative reduction 26.3%). 90- and 365-day mortality decreased by 5.6 and 5.4 percentage-points. 30/90/365-day readmissions also declined with a concurrent shortening of hospital length-of-stay. From 2000–2016, US outcomes were stagnant (p > 0.05), resulting in an inversion of the countries’ mortality and > 38,000 potential annual US lives saved.
Conclusions:
Process measure pay-for-performance led to significant improvements in English hip fracture outcomes. As efforts to improve US older adult health continue to increase, there are important lessons to be learned from a successful initiative like the BPT.
- Publication status:
- In press
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 2.9MB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004305
Authors
- Publisher:
- Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins
- Journal:
- Annals of Surgery More from this journal
- Volume:
- 275
- Issue:
- 3
- Pages:
- 506-514
- Publication date:
- 2021-01-22
- Acceptance date:
- 2020-06-12
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1528-1140
- ISSN:
-
0003-4932
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
1112030
- Local pid:
-
pubs:1112030
- Deposit date:
-
2020-06-13
- ARK identifier:
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
- Copyright date:
- 2021
- Rights statement:
- Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
- Notes:
- This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available online from Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins at: https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000004305
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record