Journal article icon

Journal article

Learning from England’s best practice tariff: Process measure pay-for-performance can improve hip fracture outcomes

Abstract:

Objective:
The objective of this study was to evaluate England's Best Practice Tariff (BPT) and consider potential implications for Medicare patients should the US adopt a similar plan.


Summary Background Data:
Since the beginning of the Affordable Care Act, Medicare has renewed efforts to improve the outcomes of older adults through introduction of an expanding set of alternative-payment models. Among trauma patients, recommended arrangements met with mixed success given concerns about the heterogeneous nature of trauma patients and resulting outcome variation. A novel approach taken for hip fractures in England could offer a viable alternative.


Methods:
Linear regression, interrupted time-series, difference-in-difference, and counterfactual models of 2000–2016 Medicare (US), HES-APC (England) death certificate-linked claims (≥65y) were used to: track US hip fracture trends, look at changes in English hip fracture trends before-and-after BPT implementation, compare changes in US-versus-English mortality, and estimate total/theoretical lives saved.


Results:
806,036 English and 3,221,109 US hospitalizations were included. Following BPT implementation, England's 30-day mortality decreased by 2.6 percentage-points (95%CI: 1.7–3.5) from a baseline of 9.9% (relative reduction 26.3%). 90- and 365-day mortality decreased by 5.6 and 5.4 percentage-points. 30/90/365-day readmissions also declined with a concurrent shortening of hospital length-of-stay. From 2000–2016, US outcomes were stagnant (p > 0.05), resulting in an inversion of the countries’ mortality and > 38,000 potential annual US lives saved.


Conclusions:
Process measure pay-for-performance led to significant improvements in English hip fracture outcomes. As efforts to improve US older adult health continue to increase, there are important lessons to be learned from a successful initiative like the BPT.

Publication status:
In press
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1097/SLA.0000000000004305

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
NDORMS
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
NDORMS
Sub department:
Botnar Research Centre
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-1008-3105
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
NDORMS
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
NDORMS
Role:
Author


Publisher:
Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins
Journal:
Annals of Surgery More from this journal
Volume:
275
Issue:
3
Pages:
506-514
Publication date:
2021-01-22
Acceptance date:
2020-06-12
DOI:
EISSN:
1528-1140
ISSN:
0003-4932


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
1112030
Local pid:
pubs:1112030
Deposit date:
2020-06-13
ARK identifier:

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP