Journal article icon

Journal article

Patient expectations for outcome with psychological intervention for psychosis

Abstract:
Background:
Initial patient perceptions of a treatment’s credibility, and expectations for improvement, have been shown to predict to a small degree outcomes for common mental health disorders. This study aimed to discover: how patients with psychosis initially perceive psychological therapy’s credibility and likely success; whether there are predictors of these first views; and, primarily, if such ideas predict improvement in persecutory delusions.

Methods:
We analysed first therapy session data on credibility and expectancy from 195 patients with non-affective psychosis taking part in clinical trials treating persecutory delusions. Baseline assessments before randomisation to therapy were used to identify potential predictors of credibility and expectancy. First session credibility and expectancy scores were tested as predictors of persecutory delusion severity six months later.

Results:
Most patients were optimistic about therapy’s potential. Baseline delusion severity did not predict credibility, β=-.02, p=.742, or expectancy, β=-.03, p=.632. Higher psychological well-being predicted higher levels of expectancy, β=.23, p=.001. Higher levels of credibility, β=-.17, p=.021, and expectancy, β=-.17, p=.020, predicted lower severity of persecutory delusions six months later. Credibility, β=.00, p=.970, and expectancy, β=-.21, p=.074, did not significantly predict uptake of therapy sessions.

Conclusions:
Treatment credibility and expectancy may account for a small proportion of improvement when psychological interventions are used to treat severe paranoia. The results are comparable to those for common mental health disorders. There was little prediction of patient variability in credibility and expectancy. It will be helpful to understand a patient’s initial views on intervention so that any concerns can be addressed.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1016/j.schres.2026.03.005

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Experimental Psychology
Oxford college:
Magdalen College
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-2541-2197
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Experimental Psychology
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Experimental Psychology
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-2749-1386


More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://ror.org/02nv4he32
Grant:
RP-2014-05-003
More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://ror.org/03x94j517
Grant:
MR/P02629X/1
More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://ror.org/0187kwz08
Grant:
NIHR305810


Publisher:
Elsevier
Journal:
Schizophrenia Research More from this journal
Volume:
292
Pages:
21-27
Publication date:
2026-03-09
Acceptance date:
2026-03-05
DOI:
EISSN:
1573-2509
ISSN:
0920-9964


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
2385342
Local pid:
pubs:2385342
Deposit date:
2026-03-05
ARK identifier:

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP