Crotaline snake bite in the Ecuadorian Amazon: randomised double blind comparative trial of three South American polyspecific antivenoms

Smalligan, R; Cole, J; Brito, N; Laing, G; Mertz, B; Manock, S; Maudlin, J; Quist, B; Holland, G; Nelson, S; Lalloo, D; Rivadeneira, G; Barragan, M; Dolley, D; Eddleston, M; Warrell, D; Theakston, R

Journal article

Crotaline snake bite in the Ecuadorian Amazon: randomised double blind comparative trial of three South American polyspecific antivenoms

Abstract:: Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of three polyspecific antivenoms for bites from pit vipers. Design: Randomised double blind comparative trial of three antivenoms. Setting: Shell, Pastaza, southeastern Ecuador. Participants: 210 patients with incoagulable blood were recruited from 221 consecutive patients admitted with snake bite between January 1997 and December 2001. Intervention: One of three antivenoms manufactured in Brazil, Colombia, and Ecuador, chosen for their preclinical potency against Ecuadorian venoms. Main outcome measures: Permanent restoration of blood coagulability after 6 and 24 hours. Results: The snakes responsible for the bites were identified in 187 cases: 109 patients (58%) were bitten by Bothrops atrox, 68 (36%) by B bilineatus, and 10 (5%) by B taeniatus, B brazili, or Lachesis muta. Eighty seven patients (41%) received Colombian antivenom, 82 (39%) received Brazilian antivenom, but only 41 (20%) received Ecuadorian antivenom because the supply was exhausted. Two patients died, and 10 developed local necrosis. All antivenoms achieved the primary end point of permanently restoring blood coagulability by 6 or 24 hours after the start of treatment in > 40% of patients. Colombian antivenom, however, was the most effective after initial doses of 20 ml (two vials), < 70 ml, and any initial dose at both 6 and 24 hours. An initial dose of 20 ml of Colombian antivenom permanently restored blood coagulability in 64% (46/72) of patients after 6 hours (P = 0.054 compared with the other two antivenoms) and an initial dose of < 70 ml was effective at 6 hours (65%, P = 0.045) and 24 hours (99%, P = 0.06). Early anaphylactoid reactions were common (53%, 73%, and 19%, respectively, for Brazilian, Colombian, and Ecuadorian antivenoms, P < 0.0001) but only three reactions were severe and none was fatal. Conclusions: All three antivenoms can be recommended for the treatment of snakebites in this region, though the reactogenicity of Brazilian and Colombian antivenoms is a cause for concern.

Publication status:: Published

Actions

Email

Email this record

Send the bibliographic details of this record to your email address.

Your Email
Please enter the email address that the record information will be sent to.

-
Your message (optional)
Please add any additional information to be included within the email.
Cite

Cite this record

APA Style

Smalligan, R., Cole, J., Brito, N., Laing, G., Mertz, B., Manock, S., Maudlin, J., Quist, B., Holland, G., Nelson, S., Lalloo, D., Rivadeneira, G., Barragan, M., Dolley, D., Eddleston, M., Warrell, D., & Theakston, R. (2004). Crotaline snake bite in the Ecuadorian Amazon: randomised double blind comparative trial of three South American polyspecific antivenoms. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 329(7475), 1129–1133.

MLA Style

Smalligan, R., et al. “Crotaline Snake Bite in the Ecuadorian Amazon: Randomised Double Blind Comparative Trial of Three South American Polyspecific Antivenoms.” BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, vol. 329, no. 7475, 2004, pp. 1129–33.

Chicago Style

Smalligan, R, J Cole, N Brito, G Laing, B Mertz, S Manock, J Maudlin, et al. 2004. “Crotaline Snake Bite in the Ecuadorian Amazon: Randomised Double Blind Comparative Trial of Three South American Polyspecific Antivenoms.” BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 329 (7475): 1129–33.
Share
Print