Journal article

The need for consensus, consistency, and core outcome sets in perioperative research.

Abstract:: Never before has the importance of outcome selection and measurement been more critical. Accurate data, which may be made public, are required for clinical revalidation, and institutional level performance data are tied with government goals to achieve targets and make comparisons between centres. In the research setting, synthesis and meta-analysis of outcome data from well designed and conducted randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have critical influence on health policy and decision-making. It is vital therefore that the outcomes measured in these significant evaluations are carefully selected by the relevant stakeholders and measured in valid and reproducible ways.

Publication status:: Published

Peer review status:: Peer reviewed

Actions

Email

Email this record

Send the bibliographic details of this record to your email address.

Your Email
Please enter the email address that the record information will be sent to.

-
Your message (optional)
Please add any additional information to be included within the email.
Cite

Cite this record

APA Style

Blazeby, J., Williamson, P., & Altman, D. (2015). The need for consensus, consistency, and core outcome sets in perioperative research. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia / Journal Canadien d'Anesthesie, 63(2), 133–137.

MLA Style

Blazeby, J., et al. “The Need for Consensus, Consistency, and Core Outcome Sets in Perioperative Research.” Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia / Journal Canadien d'Anesthesie, vol. 63, no. 2, Springer, 2015, pp. 133–37.

Chicago Style

Blazeby, J, P Williamson, and D Altman. 2015. “The Need for Consensus, Consistency, and Core Outcome Sets in Perioperative Research.” Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia / Journal Canadien d'Anesthesie 63 (2): 133–37.
Share
Print

Access Document

Files:: Altman, Blazeby and Williamson, The need for consensus, consis...

(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 105.1KB, Terms of use)

Publisher copy:: 10.1007/s12630-015-0529-2

Authors

+ Blazeby, J More by this author

Role:: Author

+ Williamson, P More by this author

Role:: Author

+ Altman, D More by this author

Institution:: University of Oxford
Division:: MSD
Department:: NDORMS
Sub department:: Centre for Statistics in Medicine
Role:: Author

Publisher:: Springer
Journal:: Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia / Journal Canadien d'Anesthesie More from this journal
Volume:: 63
Issue:: 2
Pages:: 133-137
Publication date:: 2015-08-04
DOI:: 10.1007/s12630-015-0529-2
EISSN:: 1496-8975
ISSN:: 0832-610X

Language:: English
Keywords:: SBTMR
Pubs id:: pubs:584318
UUID:: uuid:6c7be7ca-5578-4ca2-8b6e-336052d137a7
Local pid:: pubs:584318
Source identifiers:: 584318
Deposit date:: 2016-03-14

Terms of use

Copyright holder:: Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society
Copyright date:: 2015
Notes:: © Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society 2015. This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available online from Springer at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-015-0529-2

Licence:: Terms and Conditions of Use for Oxford University Research Archive

Views and Downloads

About views and downloads

If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP