Journal article
Attitudes towards faecal immunochemical testing in patients at increased risk of colorectal cancer: an online survey of GPs in England
- Abstract:
-
Background
There is increasing interest in using quantitative Faecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) to rule-out colorectal cancer (CRC) among patients with high-risk symptoms in primary care.
Aim
The study aimed to investigate general practitioners’ (GP) attitudes and willingness to use FIT over urgent two-week wait (2WW) referral.
Design and Setting
A cross-sectional online survey with 1024GPs based in England
Method
Logistic regression models were used to explore their likelihood of using FIT instead of 2WW, and reported using odds ratios and confidence intervals.
Results
Just over a third of GPs (n=365) preferred to use FIT as a rule-out test over 2WW. GPs were more willing if they were aged 36-45 (1.59 [1.04-2.43]) and 46-55 (1.99 [1.14-3.47]), thought FIT was highly accurate (1.63 [1.16-2.29]), thought patients will benefit compared to a colonoscopy (2.02 [1.46-2.79]) and were highly confident in discussing the benefits of FIT (2.14 [1.46-3.16]). GPs were less willing if they had had more than 10 urgent referrals in the last year (0.62 [0.40 - 0.94]) and thought that longer consultations will be needed (0.61 [0.44 - 0.83]).
Conclusions
Our findings suggest that the acceptability of FIT as a rule-out test in primary care is currently low with less than half of GPs who perceived FIT to be accurate preferring it over colonoscopy. Any potential guideline changes recommending FIT in high-risk patients instead of urgent referral to rule-out CRC are likely to require intensive supporting educational outreach to increase GP confidence in the accuracy and application of FIT in this context.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Version of record, pdf, 111.4KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.3399/bjgp18x699413
Authors
- Publisher:
- Royal College of General Practitioners
- Journal:
- British Journal of General Practice More from this journal
- Volume:
- 68
- Issue:
- 676
- Pages:
- e757-e764
- Publication date:
- 2018-10-25
- Acceptance date:
- 2018-07-02
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1478-5242
- ISSN:
-
0960-1643
- Pmid:
-
30297435
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:927282
- UUID:
-
uuid:6bcdebfd-5e3f-4d95-b3a5-0f1b53cf150a
- Local pid:
-
pubs:927282
- Source identifiers:
-
927282
- Deposit date:
-
2018-11-08
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- British Journal of General Practice
- Copyright date:
- 2018
- Notes:
-
© British Journal of General Practice 2018
This article is Open Access: CC BY 4.0 licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record