Journal article
Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews?
- Abstract:
- Systematic reviews are generally placed above narrative reviews in an assumed hierarchy of secondary research evidence. We argue that systematic reviews and narrative reviews serve different purposes and should be viewed as complementary. Conventional systematic reviews address narrowly focused questions; their key contribution is summarising data. Narrative reviews provide interpretation and critique; their key contribution is deepening understanding.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Version of record, pdf, 135.1KB)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1111/eci.12931
Why is the content I wish to access not available via ORA?
Bibliographic data (the information relating to research outputs) and full-text items (e.g. articles, theses, reports, etc.) arrive in ORA from several different sources. Unfortunately we are not able to make available the full-text for every research output.
Please contact the ORA team (
) if you have queries regarding unavailable content OR if you are aware of a full-text copy we can make available.
) if you have queries regarding unavailable content OR if you are aware of a full-text copy we can make available.
Content may be unavailable for the following four reasons
-
Version unsuitable
-
We have not obtained a suitable full-text for a given research output. See this page for more information.
-
Recently completed
-
Sometimes content is held in ORA but is unavailable for a fixed period of time to comply with the policies and wishes of rights holders.
-
Permissions
-
All content made available in ORA should comply with relevant rights, such as copyright. See this page for more information.
-
Clearance
-
Some thesis volumes scanned as part of the digitisation scheme funded by Dr Leonard Polonsky are currently unavailable due to sensitive material or uncleared third-party copyright content. We are attempting to contact authors whose theses are affected.
Alternative access to the full-text
You may be able to access the full-text directly from the publisher's website using the 'Publisher Copy' link in the 'Links & Downloads' box from a research output's ORA record page. This method may require an institutional or individual subscription to the journal/resource.
Authors
Funding
+ National Institute for Health Research
More from this funder
Funding agency for:
Greenhalgh, T
Grant:
BRC1215-20008
National Institute for Health Research
More from this funder
Bibliographic Details
- Publisher:
- John Wiley & Sons Ltd Publisher's website
- Journal:
- European Journal of Clinical Investigation Journal website
- Volume:
- 48
- Issue:
- 6
- Article number:
- e12931
- Publication date:
- 2018-03-26
- Acceptance date:
- 2018-03-20
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1365-2362
- ISSN:
-
0014-2972
- Pmid:
-
29578574
- Source identifiers:
-
834131
Item Description
- Language:
- English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:834131
- UUID:
-
uuid:6b483933-710d-4af2-8c0d-7d1c9474e47d
- Local pid:
- pubs:834131
- Deposit date:
- 2018-04-17
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Greenhalgh et al
- Copyright date:
- 2018
- Notes:
-
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. European Journal of Clinical Investigation published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Stichting European Society for Clinical Investigation Journal Foundation.
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record