Journal article
Reproducible research practices are underused in systematic reviews of biomedical interventions
- Abstract:
-
To evaluate how often reproducible research practices, which allow others to recreate the findings of studies, given the original data, are used in systematic reviews (SRs) of biomedical research.We evaluated a random sample of SRs indexed in MEDLINE® during February 2014, which focused on a therapeutic intervention and reported at least one meta-analysis. Data on reproducible research practices in each SR were extracted using a 26-item form by one author, with a 20% random sample extracted i...
Expand abstract
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Accepted manuscript, pdf, 1.6MB)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.10.017
Authors
Bibliographic Details
- Publisher:
- Elsevier Publisher's website
- Journal:
- Journal of Clinical Epidemiology Journal website
- Volume:
- 94
- Pages:
- 8-18
- Publication date:
- 2017-11-04
- Acceptance date:
- 2017-10-30
- DOI:
- ISSN:
-
0895-4356
- Pmid:
-
29113936
Item Description
- Language:
- English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:744933
- UUID:
-
uuid:6adcf25a-2d2b-4800-916e-ea8403b927ba
- Local pid:
- pubs:744933
- Deposit date:
- 2017-12-04
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Elsevier Inc
- Copyright date:
- 2017
- Notes:
- Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available online from Elsevier at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.10.017
Metrics
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record