Journal article
Political and unpolitical Germany: Max Weber and Thomas Mann
- Abstract:
-
This paper presents a comparison of Max Weber and Thomas Mann from a historical perspective. It does not seek to override the obvious differences between them, but it suggests that these differences reflect on the remarkable diversity and plurality of a common context: Germany seen as a community of Kultur. Furthermore, very different views of the world could still lead to significant coincidence. This is particularly true of their views on politics, where both men emerged as robust democrats. Yet they also upheld a large “unpolitical” space, a position which was symptomatic of their class, the Bildungsbürgertum, but which was ordinarily a source of political weakness in that class in early 20th century Germany. The comparison is asymmetric however. While a wide range of Weber’s texts can be drawn upon, in Mann’s case Betrachtungen eines Unpolitischen stands out as a focal point. This leads to a revaluation of that text. It was a central component in Mann’s intellectual formation; not an aberration which can be set aside.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Version of record, pdf, 2.4MB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1515/iasl-2023-0002
Authors
- Publisher:
- De Gruyter
- Journal:
- Internationales Archiv für Sozialgeschichte der deutschen Literatur More from this journal
- Volume:
- 48
- Issue:
- 1
- Pages:
- 84-127
- Publication date:
- 2023-04-28
- Acceptance date:
- 2021-12-01
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1865-9128
- ISSN:
-
0340-4528
- Language:
-
English
- Pubs id:
-
1214419
- Local pid:
-
pubs:1214419
- Deposit date:
-
2021-12-01
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Peter Ghosh
- Copyright date:
- 2023
- Rights statement:
- © 2023 Peter Ghosh, published by De Gruyter. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Licence:
- CC Attribution (CC BY)
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record