Journal article icon

Journal article

Reproducibility and associated regression dilution bias of accelerometer-derived physical activity and sleep in UK Biobank

Abstract:
Background: Previous studies on the reproducibility of 7-day accelerometer measurements have been limited by small sample sizes and short follow-up periods. We aimed to assess the long-term reproducibility of accelerometer-derived physical activity and sleep, and to illustrate the impact of regression dilution bias on the association between daily step count and coronary heart disease (CHD) in UK Biobank. Methods: We analysed data from 3138 UK Biobank participants in the main accelerometry sub-study with up to four repeat accelerometer measurements after 3–4 years. Nine physical activity and sleep phenotypes were extracted to capture different movement behaviours. Reproducibility was assessed by using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). The impact on disease associations was illustrated by considering daily step count and incident CHD using Cox regression (87 038 participants; 3879 CHD events), before and after correction for regression dilution. Results: Among the 3138 participants, 51% were women and the mean (SD) age was 63.1 (9.4) years. Reproducibility was good for overall activity, with an ICC (95% confidence interval) of 0.75 (0.74–0.76), and moderate for other phenotypes, with ICCs ranging from 0.58 (0.56–0.59) for sleep efficiency to 0.69 (0.68–0.70) for sedentary behaviour. In our example, the inverse association between daily step count and CHD showed a 20% lower risk of CHD per usual 4000 steps after correcting for regression dilution compared with 13% before correction. Conclusion: Accelerometer measurements are moderately reproducible and comparable to measures such as blood pressure. Correction for regression dilution bias is crucial to quantify associations of usual physical activity and sleep with disease risk.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Publisher copy:
10.1093/ije/dyag014

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Department:
Big Data Institute
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0009-0002-6924-3599
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Nuffield Department of Population Health
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Nuffield Department of Population Health
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-3957-5306
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Nuffield Department of Population Health
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-0139-2934
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Nuffield Department of Population Health
Role:
Author


More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://ror.org/029chgv08
Grant:
223100/Z/21/Z
More from this funder
Funder identifier:
10.13039/100014013
Grant:
10063259
More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://ror.org/05m8dr349
Grant:
NIHR203312
More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://ror.org/054225q67
Grant:
C8221/A29017
More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://ror.org/03n0ht308


Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Journal:
International Journal of Epidemiology More from this journal
Volume:
55
Issue:
2
Article number:
dyag014
Publication date:
2026-02-20
Acceptance date:
2026-01-14
DOI:
EISSN:
1464-3685
ISSN:
0300-5771


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
2383192
Local pid:
pubs:2383192
Source identifiers:
3781551
Deposit date:
2026-02-20
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP