Journal article icon

Journal article : Review

Bacterial communities in Thai ticks: revealing geographical and methodological gaps in surveillance—a 25-year scoping review

Abstract:
Ticks serve as key vectors for a diverse range of bacterial pathogens that affect humans and animals worldwide. In Thailand, a comprehensive understanding of tick-associated bacterial diversity remains limited. This scoping review synthesises published data on tick-borne bacteria across Thailand from 2001 to 2025, focusing on bacterial diversity, host–vector associations, geographic distribution, and molecular detection methods. Literature searches in NCBI, Embase, and Web of Science identified 402 studies (272 after duplicate removal), of which 39 met the inclusion criteria. Ticks were collected from animals, humans, and the environment across four zoogeographical regions. Rhipicephalus, Haemaphysalis, Dermacentor, and Amblyomma were the most commonly studied genera. Eighteen bacterial genera, including both pathogens and endosymbionts, were identified, with Coxiella-like endosymbionts, Rickettsia, Anaplasma, and Ehrlichia being the predominant genera. Rhipicephalus ticks exhibited the highest bacterial diversity, while Rickettsia spp. were the most frequently detected pathogens. Conventional PCR remained the principal diagnostic method, with limited application of quantitative and metagenomic sequencing approaches. Geographic analysis revealed that most studies were concentrated in the Northern Peninsular and Central Peninsular regions, while the Continental section of the Indo-Chinese Mainland and Korat Plateau zones were under-represented, which may limit the accuracy of regional risk assessments, as surveillance gaps can underestimate both the diversity and prevalence of pathogenic organisms in these areas. This review emphasises the intricate nature of tick–host–pathogen interactions and highlights the importance of implementing standardised genomic surveillance nationwide within a One Health framework. The findings reveal key gaps in current surveillance efforts and advocate for incorporating genomic tick monitoring into Thailand’s national One Health strategies to improve zoonotic disease preparedness.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author


More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://ror.org/029chgv08
Grant:
220211/Z/20/Z
More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://ror.org/03zhs2308
Grant:
JCPET02


Publisher:
BioMed Central
Journal:
Tropical Medicine and Health More from this journal
Volume:
54
Issue:
1
Article number:
72
Publication date:
2026-04-17
Acceptance date:
2026-04-06
DOI:
EISSN:
1349-4147
ISSN:
1349-4147


Language:
English
Keywords:
Subtype:
Review
Pubs id:
2410213
Local pid:
pubs:2410213
Source identifiers:
3961524
Deposit date:
2026-04-21
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP