Journal article icon

Journal article

Factors influencing implementation and adoption of direct oral penicillin challenge for allergy delabelling: a qualitative evaluation

Abstract:
Background: Over 95% of penicillin allergy labels are inaccurate and may be addressed in low-risk patients using direct oral penicillin challenge (DPC). This study explored the behaviour, attitudes and acceptability of patients, healthcare professionals (HCPs) and managers of using DPC in low-risk patients. Methods: Mixed-method, investigation involving patient interviews and staff focus groups at three NHS acute hospitals. Transcripts were coded using inductive and deductive thematic analysis informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework. Findings: Analysis of 43 patient interviews and three focus groups (28 HCPs: clinicians and managers) highlighted themes of ‘knowledge’, ‘beliefs about capabilities and consequences’, ‘environmental context’, ‘resources’, ‘social influences’, ‘professional role and identity’, ‘behavioural regulation and reinforcement’ and a cross-cutting theme of digital systems. Overall, study participants supported the DPC intervention. Patients expressed reassurance about being in a monitored, hospital setting. HCPs acknowledged the need for robust governance structures for ensuring clarity of roles and responsibilities and confidence. Conclusion: There were high levels of acceptability among patients and HCPs. HCPs recognised the importance of DPC. Complexities of penicillin allergy (de)labelling were highlighted, and issues of knowledge, risk, governance and workforce were identified as key determinants. These should be considered in future planning and adoption strategies for DPC.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002890
Publication website:
https://pure-oai.bham.ac.uk/ws/files/237592331/e002890.full.pdf

Authors

More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-5927-5429
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author



Publisher:
BMJ Publishing Group
Journal:
BMJ Open Quality More from this journal
Volume:
13
Issue:
3
Article number:
bmjoq-2024-002890
Publication date:
2024-09-07
Acceptance date:
2024-07-26
DOI:
EISSN:
2399-6641
ISSN:
2399-6641


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
2030626
Local pid:
pubs:2030626
Source identifiers:
2263495
Deposit date:
2024-09-16
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP