Journal article

Risks and benefits of probabilistic suicide risk tools: commentary, Fazel et al

Publication status:: Published

Actions

Email

Email this record

Send the bibliographic details of this record to your email address.

Your Email
Please enter the email address that the record information will be sent to.

-
Your message (optional)
Please add any additional information to be included within the email.
Share
Cite

Cite this record

APA Style

Fazel, S., Runeson, B., Fanshawe, T., & Sharpe, M. (2026). Risks and benefits of probabilistic suicide risk tools: commentary, Fazel et al. British Journal of Psychiatry.

MLA Style

Fazel, S, et al. “Risks and Benefits of Probabilistic Suicide Risk Tools: Commentary, Fazel Et Al.” British Journal of Psychiatry, 2026.

Chicago Style

Fazel, S, B Runeson, T Fanshawe, and M Sharpe. 2026. “Risks and Benefits of Probabilistic Suicide Risk Tools: Commentary, Fazel Et Al.” British Journal of Psychiatry.
Print

Access Document

Files:: Fazel_et_al_2026_Risks_and_benefits.pdf

(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 40.4KB, Terms of use)

Publisher copy:: 10.1192/bjp.2026.10566

Authors

+ Fazel, S More by this author

Institution:: University of Oxford
Division:: MSD
Department:: Psychiatry
Role:: Author
ORCID:: 0000-0002-5383-5365

+ Runeson, B More by this author

Role:: Author

+ Fanshawe, T More by this author

Role:: Author

+ Sharpe, M More by this author

Institution:: University of Oxford
Division:: MSD
Department:: Psychiatry
Role:: Author

Publisher:: Cambridge University Press
Journal:: British Journal of Psychiatry More from this journal
Publication date:: 2026-03-18
DOI:: 10.1192/bjp.2026.10566
EISSN:: 1472-1465
ISSN:: 0007-1250
Pmid:: 41846405

Language:: English
Pubs id:: 2391714
Local pid:: pubs:2391714
Deposit date:: 2026-03-24
ARK identifier:: ark:/29072/ora_66ed09b5458c417098ee1d786abde12f

Terms of use

Copyright holder:: Fazelet al.
Copyright date:: 2026
Rights statement:: © The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists
Notes:: The author accepted manuscript (AAM) of this paper has been made available under the University of Oxford's Open Access Publications Policy, and a CC BY public copyright licence has been applied.

Licence:: CC Attribution (CC BY)

Views and Downloads

About views and downloads

If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP