Journal article icon

Journal article

Emergency department interventions for smoking cessation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract:
Background: Emergency departments (EDs) offer a valuable opportunity to intervene to support people to quit smoking. We sought to determine the effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions delivered in the ED setting on rates of abstinence at the longest follow‐up. Methods: We undertook a systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines considering only randomised controlled trials (RCTs), based in the ED, where the goal of the intervention was smoking cessation and follow-up was at least 3 months. We systematically searched electronically published literature and trial registries from inception to May 2025. We pooled data using a Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model for behavioural interventions without pharmacotherapy, and using a fixed-effects model for interventions incorporating nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), with results reported as risk ratios (RR) and 95% CIs. The primary outcome was smoking cessation using the strictest available measure, biochemically validated where possible. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Certainty of overall evidence was assessed using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation). Results: Nineteen RCTs met inclusion criteria, of which 17 were deemed suitable for incorporating into meta-analyses. Participants randomised to receive a smoking cessation intervention involving NRT in the ED were significantly more likely to achieve abstinence (RR 1.55, 95% CI 1.27 to 1.89, p<0.0001, 6 RCTs, n=3528, I2=46%). Trials involving behavioural support alone delivered in the ED had an RR of quitting compared with controls of 1.18 (95% CI 0.85 to 1.64, p=0.32, 11 RCTs, N=4711, I2=37%). Of the 17 studies included in the meta-analyses, 14 were at high risk of bias, 1 at low risk and 2 where the risk was unclear. One study incorporated e-cigarettes and was not incorporated in the meta-analysis but demonstrated evidence of effectiveness. Conclusion: There is moderate certainty evidence that smoking cessation interventions incorporating pharmacotherapy delivered in the ED are effective in supporting smoking cessation.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1136/emermed-2025-215326

Authors

More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-5623-4178
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Primary Care Health Sciences
Sub department:
Primary Care Health Sciences
Role:
Author


Publisher:
BMJ Publishing Group
Journal:
Emergency Medicine Journal More from this journal
Article number:
emermed-2025-215326
Publication date:
2026-01-29
Acceptance date:
2025-12-20
DOI:
EISSN:
1472-0213
ISSN:
1472-0205


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
2370549
UUID:
uuid_66626628-b8de-4736-a363-3bbbfc904518
Local pid:
pubs:2370549
Source identifiers:
3710506
Deposit date:
2026-01-30
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP