Journal article icon

Journal article

Compliance with Clinical Guidelines and AI-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems: Implications for Ethics and Trust

Abstract:
Artificial intelligence (AI) is gradually transforming healthcare. However, despite its promised benefits, AI in healthcare also raises a number of ethical, legal and social concerns. Compliance by design (CbD) has been proposed as one way of addressing some of these concerns. In the context of healthcare, CbD efforts could focus on building compliance with existing clinical guidelines (CGs), given that they provide the best practices identified according to evidence-based medicine. In this paper we use the example of AI-based clinical decision support systems (CDSS) to theoretically examine whether medical AI tools could be designed to be inherently compliant with CGs, and implication for ethics and trust. We argue that AI-based CDSS systematically complying with CGs when applied to specific patient cases are not desirable, as CGs, despite their usefulness in guiding medical decision-making, are only recommendations on how to diagnose and treat medical conditions. We thus propose a new understanding of CbD for CGs as a sociotechnical program supported by AI that applies to the whole clinical decision-making process rather than just understanding CbD for CGs as a process located only within the AI tool. This implies taking into account emerging knowledge from actual clinical practices to put CGs in perspective, reflexivity from users regarding the information needed for decision-making, as well as a shift in the design culture, from AI as a stand-alone tool to AI as an in-situ service located within particular healthcare settings.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions


Access Document


Publisher copy:
10.1007/s11948-025-00562-z

Authors


More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-2698-4381
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Nuffield Department of Population Health
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-9344-3297


More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://ror.org/029chgv08


Publisher:
Springer
Journal:
Science and Engineering Ethics More from this journal
Volume:
31
Issue:
6
Article number:
34
Publication date:
2025-11-13
Acceptance date:
2025-09-29
DOI:
EISSN:
1471-5546
ISSN:
1353-3452


Language:
English
Keywords:
UUID:
uuid_660f9ce0-b33d-4d42-90f7-d18b7ee9df7b
Source identifiers:
3473187
Deposit date:
2025-11-14
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use



Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP