Journal article icon

Journal article

Cognitive restructuring, behavioral activation and cognitive behavioral therapy in the treatment of adult depression: a network meta-analysis

Abstract:

Objective: To examine if cognitive restructuring (CR), behavioral activation (BA), and cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) result in differential effects in the treatment of adult depression.
Method: We extracted randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from a database updated yearly from PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Network and pairwise meta-analyses were conducted to investigate the effects of CR, BA, and CBT delivered in a face-to-face individual format, compared with waiting list (WL) and care-as-usual (CAU), on adult depression. The primary outcome was a standardized mean difference (SMD) in posttreatment depression severity. Tolerability of treatments and depression severity at follow-up were also assessed.
Results: A total of 45 studies with 3,382 participants were included. There was no evidence of a difference in effectiveness between CR, BA, and CBT. All three interventions were superior to CAU; SMD 0.57, 95% confidence interval [CI 0.08–1.07]; 0.52 [0.34–0.71]; 0.44 [0.28–0.60], respectively and WL 1.20 [0.69–1.70]; 1.15 [0.90–1.40]; 1.07 [0.87–1.26]. No difference in tolerability was found (risk ratio [RR] vs. CAU: 1.01 [0.04–22.81], 0.84 [0.63–1.11], and 0.96 [0.76–1.21], respectively). Metaregression and sensitivity analyses did not produce material differences.
Conclusions: Results suggest that CR or BA alone and their combination (CBT) may be effective interventions in comparison to WL and CAU in the treatment of adult depression. There was no evidence suggesting differences in effectiveness among the three treatments. More research is needed to derive conclusions about the performance of CR.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1037/ccp0000654

Authors


Publisher:
American Psychological Association
Journal:
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology More from this journal
Volume:
89
Issue:
6
Pages:
563–574
Publication date:
2021-06-01
Acceptance date:
2021-04-07
DOI:
EISSN:
1939-2117
ISSN:
0022-006X


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
1170858
Local pid:
pubs:1170858
Deposit date:
2021-04-09
ARK identifier:

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP