Journal article
Cognitive restructuring, behavioral activation and cognitive behavioral therapy in the treatment of adult depression: a network meta-analysis
- Abstract:
-
Objective: To examine if cognitive restructuring (CR), behavioral activation (BA), and cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) result in differential effects in the treatment of adult depression.
Method: We extracted randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from a database updated yearly from PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Network and pairwise meta-analyses were conducted to investigate the effects of CR, BA, and CBT delivered in a face-to-face individual format, compared with waiting list (WL) and care-as-usual (CAU), on adult depression. The primary outcome was a standardized mean difference (SMD) in posttreatment depression severity. Tolerability of treatments and depression severity at follow-up were also assessed.
Results: A total of 45 studies with 3,382 participants were included. There was no evidence of a difference in effectiveness between CR, BA, and CBT. All three interventions were superior to CAU; SMD 0.57, 95% confidence interval [CI 0.08–1.07]; 0.52 [0.34–0.71]; 0.44 [0.28–0.60], respectively and WL 1.20 [0.69–1.70]; 1.15 [0.90–1.40]; 1.07 [0.87–1.26]. No difference in tolerability was found (risk ratio [RR] vs. CAU: 1.01 [0.04–22.81], 0.84 [0.63–1.11], and 0.96 [0.76–1.21], respectively). Metaregression and sensitivity analyses did not produce material differences.
Conclusions: Results suggest that CR or BA alone and their combination (CBT) may be effective interventions in comparison to WL and CAU in the treatment of adult depression. There was no evidence suggesting differences in effectiveness among the three treatments. More research is needed to derive conclusions about the performance of CR.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 855.3KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1037/ccp0000654
Authors
- Publisher:
- American Psychological Association
- Journal:
- Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology More from this journal
- Volume:
- 89
- Issue:
- 6
- Pages:
- 563–574
- Publication date:
- 2021-06-01
- Acceptance date:
- 2021-04-07
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1939-2117
- ISSN:
-
0022-006X
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
1170858
- Local pid:
-
pubs:1170858
- Deposit date:
-
2021-04-09
- ARK identifier:
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- APA
- Copyright date:
- 2021
- Rights statement:
- ©2021 APA, all rights reserved
- Notes:
- This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available from APA at: 10.1037/ccp0000654
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record