Journal article
Can social media incivility induce enthusiasm? Evidence from survey experiments
- Abstract:
- Most studies of online incivility report negative effects on attitudes and behaviors of both the victims and the audiences who are exposed to it. But while we have extensive insights about the attitudinal and behavioral consequences of incivility, less emphasis has been paid on its emotional effects. We conduct a series of survey experiments using statements posted on Twitter by elite actors along with the comments they receive and measure the emotional reactions of the public in relation to the content of the original post. We find that when the raw information is accompanied by uncivil commentary (compared to civil or no commentary), respondents express higher levels of positive and lower levels of negative emotions. Further analysis of heterogeneous effects focusing on partisanship shows that the effects are primarily driven by those who are generally expected to agree with the expert’s claim. The broader consequences of incivility as entertainment on social media platforms are discussed.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 420.0KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1093/poq/nfaa014
Authors
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- Journal:
- Public Opinion Quarterly More from this journal
- Volume:
- 84
- Issue:
- S1
- Pages:
- 284-308
- Publication date:
- 2020-07-02
- Acceptance date:
- 2019-10-22
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1537-5331
- ISSN:
-
0033-362X
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:1078500
- UUID:
-
uuid:6582d91d-b2d8-49f9-a7ea-c95ebb1a0620
- Local pid:
-
pubs:1078500
- Source identifiers:
-
1078500
- Deposit date:
-
2019-12-20
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Kosmidis and Theocharis
- Copyright date:
- 2020
- Rights statement:
- © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved.
- Notes:
- This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available online from Oxford University Press at: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfaa014
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record