Journal article icon

Journal article : Review

Ten-Year Implant Survival and Functional Outcomes Following Combined Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Call for High-Quality Comparative Trials

Abstract:
BackgroundManaging medial compartment knee osteoarthritis (OA) with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency, particularly in younger, active patients, remains challenging. Medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) combined with ACL reconstruction (ACLR) (UKACL) has gained interest, yet outcomes remain incompletely defined. This systematic review aims to evaluate the clinical effectiveness, implant survivorship, complications, and patient-reported outcomes after combined UKA and ACLR in end-stage medial OA with ACL deficiency.MethodsWe systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. Studies reporting outcomes of UKA performed with ACLR were included; case reports, technical notes, and biomechanical studies were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed with ROBINS-I V2. We extracted clinical outcomes, implant survival, complications, radiographic findings, and validated functional scores.ResultsFourteen studies comprising 353 patients met the inclusion criteria. Reported survivorship consistently exceeded 90% at 10 years. Ten revisions were reported, most commonly for lateral OA progression. Overall complication rate was 9.06% with no difference between mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing designs. Mobile-bearing implants had a slightly higher bearing dislocation risk, whereas fixed-bearing designs showed marginally higher polyethylene wear. Functional outcomes improved across studies.ConclusionCombined UKA and ACLR appears effective for younger, active patients with isolated medial OA and ACL deficiency, yielding high survivorship and consistent functional gains. Given heterogeneity among studies, high-quality, long-term randomized trials are needed to refine patient and implant selection.Level of evidenceLevel IV, systematic review of nonrandomized studies. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.2106/jbjs.oa.25.00200

Authors

More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-9136-0479
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-5511-1512
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-2018-9368
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-8466-5154


Publisher:
Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins
Journal:
JBJS Open Access More from this journal
Volume:
11
Issue:
1
Pages:
e25.00200
Publication date:
2026-01-26
DOI:
EISSN:
2472-7245
ISSN:
2472-7245
Pmid:
41589274


Language:
English
Keywords:
Subtype:
Review
Pubs id:
2368990
UUID:
uuid_64060d20-dc33-410e-8a13-69930e9f2976
Local pid:
pubs:2368990
Source identifiers:
3723713
Deposit date:
2026-02-04
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP