Journal article icon

Journal article

Which global rating scale?: A comparison of the ASSET, BAKSSS, and IGARS for the assessment of simulated arthroscopic skills

Abstract:
Background: With the move to competency-based models of surgical training, a number of assessment methods have been developed. Of these, global rating scales have emerged as popular tools, and several are specific to the assessment of arthroscopic skills. Our aim was to determine which one of a group of commonly used global rating scales demonstrated superiority in the assessment of simulated arthroscopic skills. Methods: Sixty-three individuals of varying surgical experience performed a number of arthroscopic tasks on a virtual reality simulator (VirtaMed ArthroS). Performance was blindly assessed by two observers using three commonly used global rating scales used to assess simulated skills. Performance was also assessed by validated objective motion analysis. Results: All of the global rating scales demonstrated construct validity, with significant differences between each skill level and each arthroscopic task (p < 0.002, Mann-Whitney U test). Interrater reliability was excellent for each global rating scale. Correlations of global rating scale ratings with motion analysis were high and strong for each global rating scale when correlated with time taken (Spearman rho, 20.95 to 20.76; p < 0.001), and correlation with total path length was significant and moderately strong (Spearman rho, 20.94 to 20.64; p < 0.001). Conclusions: No single global rating scale demonstrated superiority as an assessment tool. Clinical Relevance: For these commonly used arthroscopic global rating scales, none was particularly superior and any one score could therefore be used. Agreement on using a single score seems sensible, and it would seem unnecessary to develop further scales with the same domains for these purposes.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.2106/jbjs.o.00434

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
NDORMS
Oxford college:
Worcester College
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
Medical Sciences Division
Department:
HF NDORMS
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
Medical Sciences Division
Department:
NDORMS
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
Medical Sciences Division
Department:
NDORMS
Oxford college:
Pembroke College
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-1818-5800



Publisher:
Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins
Journal:
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume More from this journal
Volume:
98
Issue:
1
Pages:
75-81
Publication date:
2016-01-06
DOI:
EISSN:
1535-1386
ISSN:
0021-9355
Pmid:
26738906


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
pubs:587073
UUID:
uuid:63570ab2-0c26-4dec-8704-9564bcdde7ed
Local pid:
pubs:587073
Source identifiers:
587073
Deposit date:
2018-04-16
ARK identifier:

Terms of use


Views and Downloads

Views and downloads will return soon






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP