Journal article
An evaluation of commonly used surrogate baseline creatinine values to classify AKI during acute infection
- Abstract:
- Introduction Classification of acute kidney injury (AKI) requires a premorbid baseline creatinine, often unavailable in studies in acute infection. Methods We evaluated commonly used surrogate and imputed baseline creatinine values against a “reference” creatinine measured during follow-up in an adult clinical trial cohort. Known AKI incidence (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes [KDIGO] criteria) was compared with AKI incidence classified by (1) back-calculation using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation with and without a Chinese ethnicity correction coefficient; (2) back-calculation using the Chronic Kidney Disease–Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation; (3) assigning glomerular filtration rate (GFR) from age and sex-standardized reference tables; and (4) lowest measured creatinine during admission. Back-calculated distributions were performed using GFRs of 75 and 100 ml/min. Results All equations using an assumed GFR of 75 ml/min underestimated AKI incidence by more than 50%. Back-calculation with CKD-EPI and GFR of 100 ml/min most accurately predicted AKI but misclassified all AKI stages and had low levels of agreement with true AKI diagnoses. Back-calculation using MDRD and assumed GFR of 100 ml/min, age and sex-reference GFR values adjusted for good health, and lowest creatinine during admission performed similarly, best predicting AKI incidence (area under the receiver operating characteristic curves [AUC ROCs] of 0.85, 0.87, and 0.85, respectively). MDRD back-calculation using a cohort mean GFR showed low total error (22%) and an AUC ROC of 0.85. Conclusion Current methods for estimating baseline creatinine are large sources of potential error in acute infection studies. Preferred alternatives include MDRD equation back-calculation with a population mean GFR, age- and sex-specific GFR values corrected for “good health,” or lowest measured creatinine. Studies using surrogate baseline creatinine values should report specific methodology.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Version of record, 1.3MB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1016/j.ekir.2020.12.020
Authors
- Publisher:
- Elsevier
- Journal:
- Kidney International Reports More from this journal
- Volume:
- 6
- Issue:
- 3
- Pages:
- 645-656
- Publication date:
- 2020-12-31
- Acceptance date:
- 2020-12-15
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
2468-0249
- Pmid:
-
33732979
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
1168145
- Local pid:
-
pubs:1168145
- Deposit date:
-
2021-06-30
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Elsevier, Inc.
- Copyright date:
- 2021
- Rights statement:
- Copyright 2021 Published by Elsevier, Inc., on behalf of the International Society of Nephrology. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record