Journal article icon

Journal article

Power, interests, and maternal health care: a political economy analysis of service delivery redesign in Kenya

Abstract:
The maternal and newborn health (MNH) service delivery redesign (SDR) in Kakamega County, Kenya, represents the country's first system-level reorganization of MNH services. The reform aimed to improve care quality and reduce mortality by centralizing delivery services at designated hubs. Using a political economy lens, we examined how ideology, political dynamics, and institutional structures shaped the agenda-setting, adoption, implementation, and sustainability of SDR. We drew on data from document reviews, stakeholder analysis, semi-structured interviews, and non-participant observation to assess the structural, contextual, and institutional factors influencing the reform. Ambiguity around SDR's purpose contributed to the community's uncertain engagement characterized by neither full endorsement nor resistance, highlighting the need for clearer communication and participation to build ownership. The interaction between formal institutions (county health governance and partnership frameworks) and informal norms (trust, shared interpretation, and relational coordination) created early momentum for implementation, particularly among health system actors. However, limited financial capacity and unclear alignment with national policy priorities undermined progress and long-term viability. Kakamega's experience demonstrates how political incentives, devolved autonomy, and local institutional context jointly shape reform outcomes. Achieving successful implementation of system-level reforms requires integrating local political leadership, strengthening community engagement, aligning with evolving national policies, and securing predictable financing. This study provides practical lessons for future MNH and system-level reforms in Kenya and similar decentralized, resource-constrained settings. Lessons include the importance of balancing formal and informal institutions to ensure both political feasibility and enduring impact.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1093/heapol/czaf111

Authors

More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-8394-8857


More from this funder
Funder identifier:
10.13039/100000865
Grant:
# 263771.5119872


Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Journal:
Health Policy and Planning More from this journal
Volume:
41
Issue:
4
Pages:
558-569
Publication date:
2025-12-18
Acceptance date:
2025-12-08
DOI:
EISSN:
1460-2237
ISSN:
0268-1080


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
2352820
Local pid:
pubs:2352820
Source identifiers:
3959185
Deposit date:
2026-04-21
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP