Journal article icon

Journal article

‘Two sides of the same coin’? A longitudinal analysis evaluating whether financial austerity accelerated NHS privatisation in England 2013-2020

Abstract:
Objectives: To understand the relationship between increasing privatisation of the NHS and austerity cuts to public funding. Design: Longitudinal analysis. Setting: 170 Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) in England between 2013 and 2020. Intervention: The UK austerity programme, spearheaded by the conservative-led governments of the 2010s, leveraged the 2008 financial crisis to roll-back spending to local government and social security spending. They also restricted the rate of growth in NHS spending—but cuts varied for different areas, often impacting deprived areas hardest. Main outcome: For-profit outsourcing by NHS commissioners. After the implementation of the 2012 Health and Social Care act commissioners were encouraged and obliged to open contracts to the private sector. The uptake of for-profit outsourcing varied massively. Some CCGs contracted out almost half of their activity, and others almost none. Results: We calculate the size of austerity across all CCGs. The financial restrictions meant that commissioners had, on average, £21.2 m more debt by 2021 than in 2014 in real terms. We find that there is a null and very small effect of changes to local NHS funding on for-profit outsourcing. A decrease in £100 per capita of NHS funding corresponds in a decrease in 0.441 percentage points (95% CI −0.240 to 1.121) of for-profit expenditure. We also find that local changes to public expenditure on the NHS, local government and social security do not confound the relationship between for-profit outsourcing and treatable mortality rates. Conclusions: NHS privatisation at the local level does not appear to be a direct response to or result of austerity. That does not mean that it is unproblematic. Rather than being confounded by funding levels, the deteriorating health outcomes associated with privatisation should be considered as a distinct concern to the disastrous health effects of austerity policies.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1136/bmjph-2024-000964

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-2619-7895
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-7804-7958
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-9114-965X


More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://ror.org/01kpjmx04
More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://ror.org/029chgv08


Publisher:
BMJ Publishing Group
Journal:
BMJ Public Health More from this journal
Volume:
2
Issue:
1
Article number:
bmjph-2024-000964
Publication date:
2024-07-16
Acceptance date:
2024-05-20
DOI:
EISSN:
2753-4294
ISSN:
2753-4294


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
2019483
Local pid:
pubs:2019483
Source identifiers:
2119427
Deposit date:
2024-07-18
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP