Journal article
False positives are common in single-station template matching
- Abstract:
- Template matching has become a cornerstone technique of observational seismology. By taking known events, and scanning them against a continuous record, new events smaller than the signal-to-noise ratio can be found, substantially improving the magnitude of completeness of earthquake catalogues. Template matching is normally used in an array setting, however as we move into the era of planetary seismology, we are likely to apply template matching for very small arrays or even single stations. Given the high impact of planetary seismology studies on our understanding of the structure and dynamics of non-Earth bodies, it is important to assess the reliability of template matching in the small-n setting. Towards this goal, we estimate a lower bound on the rate of false positives for single-station template matching by examining the behaviour of correlations of totally uncorrelated white noise. We find that, for typical processing regimes and match thresholds, false positives are likely quite common. We must therefore be exceptionally careful when considering the output of template matching in the small-n setting.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Version of record, pdf, 305.2KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.26443/seismica.v2i2.385
Authors
- Publisher:
- Seismica
- Journal:
- Seismica More from this journal
- Volume:
- 2
- Issue:
- 2
- Publication date:
- 2023-08-11
- Acceptance date:
- 2023-07-25
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
2816-9387
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Subjects:
- Pubs id:
-
1511267
- Local pid:
-
pubs:1511267
- Deposit date:
-
2023-09-05
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Muir et al.
- Copyright date:
- 2023
- Rights statement:
- © 2023 Jack Muir, Benjamin Fernando, Elizabeth Barrett. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Licence:
- CC Attribution (CC BY)
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record