Journal article
Trabecular metal acetabular components reduce the risk of revision following primary total hip arthroplasty: A propensity score matched study from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales
- Abstract:
-
Background
Trabecular metal (TM) coated acetabular components are increasingly used in both primary and revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, previous studies assessing TM acetabular components have been small single-centre cohorts with most lacking a control group. We compared revision rates following primary THA between TM and non-TM coated acetabular components.
Methods
A retrospective observational study was performed using National Joint Registry data, which included primary THAs with the same cementless acetabular component (either TM or non- TM coated). TM and non-TM implants were matched for multiple potential confounding factors using propensity scores. Outcomes following primary THA (revision for all-cause acetabular indications, aseptic acetabular loosening, and infection) were compared between matched groups using competing risk regression analysis.
Results
In 18,200 primary THAs (9,100 TM and 9,100 non-TM), the overall prevalence of acetabular revision, revision for aseptic acetabular loosening, and septic revision was 1.2%, 0.13%, and 0.59% respectively. Five-year revision rates for all-causes (1.0% vs. 1.8%; sub-hazard ratio (SHR)=0.57, 95% CI=0.43-0.76; p<0.001), aseptic acetabular loosening (0.1% vs. 0.2%; SHR=0.35, CI=0.14-0.90; p=0.029), and infection (0.5% vs. 0.9%; SHR=0.51, CI=0.34-0.76; p=0.001) were all lower in TM compared with non-TM implants.
Conclusion
Following primary THA, TM coated implants had a reduced risk of both aseptic and septic revision compared with non-TM implants. Although absolute differences in revision risk were small, they may be clinically significant if TM designs were implanted in more complex cases.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 605.2KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1016/j.arth.2017.08.036
Authors
- Publisher:
- Elsevier
- Journal:
- Journal of Arthroplasty More from this journal
- Volume:
- 33
- Issue:
- 2
- Pages:
- 447-452
- Publication date:
- 2017-09-05
- Acceptance date:
- 2017-08-26
- DOI:
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:724350
- UUID:
-
uuid:6103b1a2-e6cb-449b-a5e7-1cf2286e72a0
- Local pid:
-
pubs:724350
- Source identifiers:
-
724350
- Deposit date:
-
2017-08-26
- ARK identifier:
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Elsevier Inc
- Copyright date:
- 2017
- Notes:
- © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available online from Elsevier at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.08.036
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record