Journal article icon

Journal article : Review

Ten misconceptions about CBT for psychosis

Abstract:
CBT for psychosis is an established and evolving psychological therapy. Historical controversies about the nature of psychosis persist, and more recent debates about the outcome literature lack precision, muddying the waters further. Based on our experience as clinicians, teachers and supervisors, and following NHS and national lead roles, we describe ten common misconceptions about CBT for psychosis. These include misconceptions about the evidence, the focus of therapy, ‘thinking positively’, and the nature of collaboration and the therapeutic relationship. We refute these misconceptions based on current theory, research, and best practice guidelines. We highlight the need to get out of the clinic room, measure the impact of therapy on personal recovery and autonomy, and meet training and governance requirements. It is essential that clinicians, service leads, and our professional bodies uphold core standards of care if people with psychosis are to have access to high quality CBT of the standard we would be happy to see offered to our own family and friends. Key learning aims: (1) To recognise common misconceptions about CBT for psychosis. (2) To counter these misconceptions theoretically and empirically – to inform ourselves, colleagues and service leads committed to ensuring high quality CBT for psychosis. (3) To highlight statutory and professional body responsibilities to ensure parity of esteem for people with psychosis, who deserve high quality, ‘full dose’ treatments delivered by appropriately trained clinicians, and supported by robust governance systems, just as we would expect for people with physical health conditions.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Publisher copy:
10.1017/s1754470x25100275

Authors

More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-1579-7959
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Experimental Psychology
Sub department:
Experimental Psychology
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-1752-5236


Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Journal:
The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist More from this journal
Volume:
18
Article number:
e51
Publication date:
2025-10-03
Acceptance date:
2025-07-28
DOI:
EISSN:
1754470X


Language:
English
Keywords:
Subtype:
Review
Pubs id:
2301264
Local pid:
pubs:2301264
Source identifiers:
3339022
Deposit date:
2025-10-03
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP