Journal article
Relocation and dislocation: civilian, refugee, and military movement as factors in the disintegration of postwar China, 1945-49
- Abstract:
- This article argues that massive human displacement was one of the defining factors in China’s immediate postwar period (1945-49). It shows that at least three distinctive groups were dispersed during the wartime years and needed to be resettled after the war ended in August 1945: civilian refugees, administrators who had been relocated to the temporary capital at Chongqing, and troops transferred in anticipation of an upcoming civil war between the Nationalists and the Communists. The article argues that China’s new sovereign status in 1945 was paradoxically a source of weakness when it came to resettlement and reconstruction, as China sought international funds to undertake its own reconstruction, but could not demit responsibility to an external actor to organize matters as the US did in western Europe. A growing sense of anomie and unsettlement prevented resettlement and China remained a zone in which international and domestic conflict came together. Both sets of factors shaped the dislocation that destroyed the possibilities of a stable resettlement in China after the great displacement of wartime.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 496.4KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1017/S0165115322000134
Authors
- Publisher:
- Cambridge University Press
- Journal:
- Itinerario More from this journal
- Volume:
- 46
- Issue:
- 2
- Pages:
- 193 - 213
- Publication date:
- 2022-09-29
- Acceptance date:
- 2021-06-28
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
2041-2827
- ISSN:
-
0165-1153
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
1188838
- Local pid:
-
pubs:1188838
- Deposit date:
-
2021-08-01
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Rana Mitter
- Copyright date:
- 2022
- Rights statement:
- © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Research Institute for History, Leiden University
- Notes:
- This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available online from Cambridge University Press at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0165115322000134
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record