To share or not to share…incentivizing data sharing in life science communities

Journal article

Most scientists recognize the importance of sharing data online in an open fashion. Nonetheless, many studies have documented the concerns that accompany data sharing activities, including loss of credit or IP, misuse and the time needed to curate interoperable data. To this end, discussions around data sharing often identify incentives that could potentially ameliorate these disincentivising concerns.

Nonetheless, current Open Data discussions often rely on evidence-based studies to identify the disincentives to overcome. This results in highly specific and directed interventions. In contrast, this paper offers a different interpretation of these concerns. To do so, it makes use of the Thomas Theorem which suggests that: “If men define situations as real, they are real in their consequences”.

Using empirical evidence from sub-Saharan African (bio)chemistry laboratories, this paper illustrates how individual perceptions of research environments – whether associated with evidence or not – are highly influential in shaping data sharing practices. It concludes with the suggestion that discussion on incentivising data sharing amongst scientific communities need to take a broader set of concerns into account and offer a more creative approach to ameliorating environmental disincentives.

Authors: Bezuidenhout, L

• Publication status: Published
• Peer review status: Peer reviewed
• Publisher: Wiley
• Journal: Developing World Bioethics
• Volume: 19
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 18-24
• Publication date: 2018-01-22
• Acceptance date: 2018-01-05
• DOI: 10.1111/dewb.12183
• EISSN: 1471-8847
• ISSN: 1471-8731
• Keywords: low/middle-income countries; data sharing; Thomas Theorem; open data; incentives