Journal article icon

Journal article

Patients' views on interactions with practitioners for type 2 diabetes: a longitudinal qualitative study in primary care over 10 years

Abstract:

Background: It has been suggested that interactions between patients and practitioners in primary care have the potential to delay progression of complications in type 2 diabetes. However, as primary care faces greater pressures, patient experiences of patient–practitioner interactions might be changing.

Aim: To explore the views of patients with type 2 diabetes on factors that are of significance to them in patient–practitioner interactions in primary care after diagnosis, and over the last 10 years of living with the disease.

Design and setting: A longitudinal qualitative analysis over 10 years in UK primary care.

Method: The study was part of a qualitative and quantitative examination of patient experience within the existing ADDITION-Cambridge and ADDITION-Plus trials from 2002 to 2016. The researchers conducted a qualitative descriptive analysis of free-text comments to an open-ended question within the CARE measure questionnaire at 1 and 10 years after diagnosis with diabetes. Data were analysed cross-sectionally at each time point, and at an individual level moving both backwards and forwards between time points to describe emergent topics.

Results: At the 1-year follow-up, 311 out of 1106 (28%) participants had commented; 101 out of 380 (27%) participants commented at 10-year follow-up; and 46 participants commented at both times. Comments on preferences for face-to-face contact, more time with practitioners, and relational continuity of care were more common over time.

Conclusion: This study highlights issues related to the wider context of interactions between patients and practitioners in the healthcare system over the last 10 years since diagnosis. Paradoxically, these same aspects of care that are valued over time from diagnosis are also increasingly unprotected in UK primary care.

Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions


Access Document


Publisher copy:
10.3399/bjgp17X693917

Authors


More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Primary Care Health Sciences
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-0175-443X



Publisher:
Royal College of General Practitioners
Journal:
British Journal of General Practice More from this journal
Volume:
68
Issue:
666
Pages:
e36-e43
Publication date:
2017-12-28
Acceptance date:
2017-07-18
DOI:
EISSN:
1478-5242
ISSN:
0960-1643
Pmid:
29203681


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
pubs:809939
UUID:
uuid:5eb98554-96dc-47ba-ab5d-488d1d094f69
Local pid:
pubs:809939
Source identifiers:
809939
Deposit date:
2018-12-19

Terms of use



Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP