Journal article icon

Journal article

The role of intra‐operative cell salvage in patient blood management for revision hip arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study

Abstract:
Cell salvage is an important component of blood management in patients undergoing revision hip arthroplasty surgery. However concerns regarding efficacy and patient selection remain. The aims of this study were to describe intra‐operative blood loss, cell salvage re‐infusion volumes and red blood cell transfusion rates for revision hip procedures and to identify factors associated with the ability to salvage sufficient blood intra‐operatively to permit processing and re‐infusion. Data were collected from a prospective cohort of 664 consecutive patients undergoing revision hip surgery at a single tertiary centre from 31 March 2015 to 1 April 2018. Indications for revision surgery were aseptic (n = 393 (59%)) fracture (n = 160 (24%)) and infection (n = 111 (17%)). Salvaged blood was processed and re‐infused when blood loss exceeded 500 ml. Mean (SD ) intra‐operative blood loss was 1038 (778) ml across all procedures. Salvaged blood was re‐infused in 505 of 664 (76%) patients. Mean (SD ) re‐infusion volume was 253 (169) ml. In total, 246 of 664 (37%) patients received an allogeneic red blood cell transfusion within 72 h of surgery. Patients undergoing femoral component revision only (OR (95%CI ) 0.41 (0.23–0.73)) or acetabular component revision only (0.53 (0.32–0.87)) were less likely to generate sufficient blood salvage volume for re‐infusion compared with revision of both components. Compared with aseptic indications, patients undergoing revision surgery for infection (1.87 (1.04–3.36)) or fracture (4.43 (2.30–8.55)) were more likely to generate sufficient blood salvage volume for re‐infusion. Our data suggest that cell salvage is efficacious in this population. Cases where the indication is infection or fracture and where both femoral and acetabular components are to be revised should be prioritised.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions


Access Document


Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1111/anae.14989

Authors


More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
NDORMS
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-4616-7482
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Department:
NDORMS
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Department:
NDORMS
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Department:
NDORMS
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Department:
NDORMS
Role:
Author


Publisher:
Wiley
Journal:
Anaesthesia More from this journal
Volume:
75
Issue:
4
Pages:
479-486
Publication date:
2020-02-09
Acceptance date:
2019-12-22
DOI:
EISSN:
1365-2044
ISSN:
0003-2409


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
pubs:1079278
UUID:
uuid:5df9bb60-978f-411a-abf3-e80b1c0c742a
Local pid:
pubs:1079278
Source identifiers:
1079278
Deposit date:
2019-12-24

Terms of use



Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP