Journal article icon

Journal article : Comment

Continual updating and monitoring of clinical prediction models: time for dynamic prediction systems?

Abstract:
Clinical prediction models (CPMs) have become fundamental for risk stratification across healthcare. The CPM pipeline (development, validation, deployment, and impact assessment) is commonly viewed as a one-time activity, with model updating rarely considered and done in a somewhat ad hoc manner. This fails to address the fact that the performance of a CPM worsens over time as natural changes in populations and care pathways occur. CPMs need constant surveillance to maintain adequate predictive performance. Rather than reactively updating a developed CPM once evidence of deteriorated performance accumulates, it is possible to proactively adapt CPMs whenever new data becomes available. Approaches for validation then need to be changed accordingly, making validation a continuous rather than a discrete effort. As such, “living” (dynamic) CPMs represent a paradigm shift, where the analytical methods dynamically generate updated versions of a model through time; one then needs to validate the system rather than each subsequent model revision.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions


Access Document


Publisher copy:
10.1186/s41512-020-00090-3

Authors



Publisher:
BioMed Central
Journal:
Diagnostic and Prognostic Research More from this journal
Volume:
5
Issue:
1
Article number:
1
Publication date:
2021-01-11
Acceptance date:
2020-12-08
DOI:
EISSN:
2397-7523
Pmid:
33431065


Language:
English
Keywords:
Subtype:
Comment
Pubs id:
1158756
Local pid:
pubs:1158756
Deposit date:
2021-01-27

Terms of use



Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP