Journal article
Rethinking the origins and architecture of the Temple of Onias
- Abstract:
- This article revisits the appearance and architectural identity of the Temple of Onias, challenging the assumption that it replicated the Jerusalem Temple. The temple’s history, preserved mainly in Josephus’ contradictory accounts, is obscured by textual inconsistencies and the absence of archaeological evidence. While Josephus alternately claims the Oniad sanctuary resembled and diverged from Jerusalem’s, this study argues that such contradictions reflect his reliance on multiple sources and his later ideological commitment to a ‘one-Temple’ theology privileging Jerusalem. Moving beyond the textual impasse, the article reconsiders Josephus’ remark that Onias built on the ruins of an Egyptian shrine dedicated to the feline deity Bastet, proposing that the temple was a ‘recycled’ sacred space shaped by local architectural traditions, including so-called Egyptian tower houses. Comparative analysis with Ptolemaic temples, especially Hathor’s sanctuary at Deir el-Medina, underscores parallels in layout and construction, situating Onias’ temple within broader Ptolemaic religious and military strategies.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 890.5KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.3828/jjs.2026.77.1.1
Authors
- Publisher:
- Liverpool University Press
- Journal:
- Journal of Jewish Studies More from this journal
- Volume:
- 77
- Issue:
- 1
- Pages:
- 1-23
- Publication date:
- 2026-04-07
- Acceptance date:
- 2025-12-22
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
2056-6689
- ISSN:
-
0022-2097
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
2353803
- Local pid:
-
pubs:2353803
- Deposit date:
-
2025-12-22
- ARK identifier:
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Oxford Centre for Hebrew and Jewish Studies
- Copyright date:
- 2026
- Rights statement:
- © Oxford Centre for Hebrew and Jewish Studies, 2026.
- Notes:
- The author accepted manuscript (AAM) of this paper has been made available under the University of Oxford's Open Access Publications Policy, and a CC BY public copyright licence has been applied.
- Licence:
- CC Attribution (CC BY)
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record