Working paper
Rank robustness of composite indices : dominance and ambiguity
- Abstract:
-
Many structures in economics – from development indices to expected utility – take the form of a linear composite index, which aggregates linearly across multiple dimensions using a vector of weights. Judgments rendered by composite indices are often given great importance, yet by definition are contingent on an initial vector of weights. A comparison made with one weighting vector could be robust to variations in the weights or, alternatively, it may be reversed at some other plausible vector. This paper presents criteria to discern between these two cases. A general robustness quasi-ordering is defined that requires dominance or unanimous comparisons for a set of weighting vectors, and methods from the Bewley model of Knightian uncertainty are invoked to characterize it. We focus on a particular set of weighting vectors suggested by the epsilon-contamination model of ambiguity, which allows the degree of confidence in the initial weighting vector to play a role. We provide a practical vector-valued representation of the resulting epsilon-robustness quasi-ordering and propose a numerical measure to gauge the robustness of a given comparison. An empirical illustration reports on the robustness of Human Development Index country rankings. We extend our methods to certain nonlinear composite indices and explore the links with decision theory, partial comparability in social choice, and the measurement of the freedom of choice.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Reviewed (other)
Actions
Authors
- Publisher:
- Oxford Poverty & Human Development Initiative (OPHI)
- Series:
- OPHI working paper
- Publication date:
- 2012-01-01
- Edition:
- Publisher's version
- ISSN:
-
2040-8188
- Paper number:
- 26b
- ISBN:
- 9781907194436
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- UUID:
-
uuid:5c247b0e-9e98-4c7c-95f0-2a8d09056434
- Local pid:
-
ora:9416
- Deposit date:
-
2014-11-27
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Oxford Poverty & Human Development Initiative
- Copyright date:
- 2012
- Notes:
- Copyright © Oxford Poverty & Human Development Initiative 2012. This publication is copyright, however it may be reproduced without fee for teaching or non-profit purposes, but not for resale. Formal permission is required for all such uses, and will normally be granted immediately. For copying in any other circumstances, or for re-use in other publications, or for translation or adaptation, prior written permission must be obtained from OPHI and may be subject to a fee.
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record