Journal article icon

Journal article

Ionization of the atomic gas in redshifted radio sources

Abstract:
We report the results of a survey for H I 21-cm absorption at z ≲ 0.4 in a new sample of radio sources with the Giant Metrewave Radio Telescope. Of the 11 sources for which there are good data, we obtain zero detections, where four are expected upon accounting for the ionizing photon rates and sensitivity. Adding these to the previously published values, we confirm that the non-detection of 21-cm absorption in active sources at high redshift is due to photo-ionization of the gas rather than excitation by 21-cm photons (significant at 6.09σ and 2.90σ, respectively). We also confirm a strong correlation between the absorption strength and the reddening of the source, suggesting that dust plays a significant role in shielding the gas from the ambient ultraviolet field. An anticorrelation between the 21-cm detection rate and the radio turnover frequency is also found, which runs contrary to what is expected on the basis that the higher the turnover frequency, the more compact the source. It is, however, consistent with the hypothesis that the turnover frequency is related to the electron density, supported by a correlation between the turnover frequency and ionizing photon rate.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions


Access Document


Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1093/mnras/stz038

Authors


More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-1136-2555


Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Journal:
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society More from this journal
Volume:
484
Issue:
1
Pages:
1182–1191
Publication date:
2019-01-07
Acceptance date:
2018-12-24
DOI:
EISSN:
1365-2966
ISSN:
0035-8711


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
pubs:966262
UUID:
uuid:5b6b2049-746e-4cb7-ade9-d0b8cebebd11
Local pid:
pubs:966262
Source identifiers:
966262
Deposit date:
2019-02-10

Terms of use



Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP