Journal article icon

Journal article : Review

Prehabilitation for lumbar spinal stenosis: understanding mechanisms and contexts for enhanced engagement—a realist review

Abstract:
Background: Neurogenic claudication (NC) due to lumbar spinal stenosis is the most common reason for spinal surgery in older adults. Prehabilitation may improve outcomes and reduce costs, but current evidence is conflicting. It remains unclear who benefits most, which mechanisms optimise outcomes and what outcomes matter to patients. This review aimed to develop a programme theory explaining what works, for whom, how and in what contexts for prehabilitation of NC surgical candidates. Methods: An initial programme theory, comprising context-mechanism-outcome configurations (CMOCs), was developed through iterative mapping and consultation with experts (n = 6) and patients (n = 7). This theory was refined via two systematic literature searches and further stakeholder feedback. Studies were assessed for relevance, richness and rigour. Data were holistically coded using abductive and retroductive reasoning to create causal maps, which informed CMOC refinement. Results: From 1422 records, 67 papers were included. The final programme theory included 14 CMOCs focused on patient engagement, a priority identified through patient consultation. Engagement was contingent on clear, consistent communication and addressing misconceptions among both patients and professionals. A shared understanding increased perceived value and avoided missed opportunities for preparation. Personalisation and collaborative goal-setting enhanced ownership and motivation. Ongoing support—via healthcare professional contact and peer input—helped counteract anxiety and feelings of abandonment during the surgical wait. Conclusions: Engagement with prehabilitation for NC can be improved through clear communication, tailored interventions and sustained support. Further research is needed to test whether theory-informed programmes improve outcomes in this population.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1093/ageing/afaf311

Authors

More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-7837-7260
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
NDORMS
Sub department:
Botnar Institute for Musculoskeletal Sciences
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-0638-0406


Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Journal:
Age and Ageing More from this journal
Volume:
54
Issue:
10
Article number:
afaf311
Publication date:
2025-10-24
Acceptance date:
2025-09-25
DOI:
EISSN:
1468-2834
ISSN:
0002-0729


Language:
English
Keywords:
Subtype:
Review
Pubs id:
2302098
Local pid:
pubs:2302098
Source identifiers:
3407949
Deposit date:
2025-10-24
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP