Journal article icon

Journal article

Community interventions for anxiety and depression in adults and young people: a systematic review

Abstract:

Background: Growing evidence suggests that community-based interventions may be effective for anxiety and depression. This study aimed to describe studies of community interventions delivered to adults and/or young people, either in person or online, evaluated in randomised controlled trials and provide an indication as to their effectiveness, acceptability, quality of data and where possible, mechanisms of action. We included interventions delivered at and/or by museums, art galleries, libraries, gardens, music groups/choirs and sports clubs.

Method: We developed and followed a preregistered protocol: PROSPERO CRD42020204471. Randomised controlled trials in adults and young people were identified in an extensive search with no date/time, language, document type and publication status limitations. Studies were selected according to predetermined eligibility criteria and data independently extracted and then assessed using Risk of Bias 1. The studies were deemed too heterogeneous for meta-analysis and were therefore reported using a narrative synthesis.

Results: Our analysis included 31 studies, with 2898 participants. Community interventions most studied in randomised controlled trials were community music (12 studies, 1432 participants), community exercise (14 studies, 955 participants) and community gardens/gardening (6 studies, 335 participants). The majority of studies were from high-income countries – many were in specific populations (such as those with physical health problems) and were generally of low quality. Dropout rates across the included studies were low (1 participant on average per 100 participants). The inadequate description of interventions limited identification of potential mechanisms of action.

Discussion: The uncertainty of the evidence allows only a weak recommendation in support of community interventions for anxiety and depression. The results suggest community engagement is a promising area for wide-reaching interventions to be implemented and evaluated, but more high-quality trials are needed, especially in young people and under-represented communities.

Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1177/00048674221150362

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Psychiatry
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-1437-3118
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Psychiatry
Research group:
Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-3280-3978
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Psychiatry
Research group:
Oxford Precision Psychiatry Lab, NIHR Oxford Health Biomedical Research Centre
Oxford college:
Brasenose College
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-8717-0832
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Psychiatry
Role:
Author


Publisher:
SAGE Publications
Journal:
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry More from this journal
Volume:
57
Issue:
9
Pages:
1223-1242
Publication date:
2023-02-01
DOI:
EISSN:
1440-1614
ISSN:
0004-8674


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
1326507
Local pid:
pubs:1326507
Deposit date:
2023-02-02
ARK identifier:

Terms of use


Views and Downloads

Views and downloads will return soon






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP