Journal article icon

Journal article : Review

Insights and outcomes of day-case percutaneous nephrolithotomy: results of a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis

Abstract:
Background: Traditionally performed as an inpatient procedure, day-case or ambulatory percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has emerged in recent years as a promising alternative offering the potential to reduce hospital admissions and healthcare costs, without compromising patient outcomes. Objectives: Conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to critically evaluate the efficacy, safety and overall outcomes of day-case PCNL Design: The systematic review was conducted in line with PRISMA guidelines (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses). Data sources and methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, CENTRAL and Cochrane Databases from inception until January 2025 (CRD42024584357). The PICO statement for this systematic review is as follows: in patients with renal stones, what are the outcomes of day-case PCNL (intervention) compared with inpatient PCNL (comparator)? The authors included studies with more than 50 adult patients evaluating day-case PCNL (postoperative hospital stay ⩽ 24 h) written in the English language. Results: From an initial literature search of 2122 articles, 16 studies were identified, from which 3133 patients were included. A variety of standard, mini and ultra-mini techniques were used, with the majority opting for tubeless (61%) or totally tubeless PCNL (16%). The mean stone size was 21.5 ± 13.5 mm, with five studies including patients with renal structural abnormalities (3.6%). The pooled mean stone-free rate (SFR) was 90% (95% CI: 0.859–0.931), with a readmission rate of 3.2% (95% CI: 0.018–0.046). The overall complication rate was 10.7% (95% CI: 0.078–0.137), with most complications classified as minor with Clavien–Dindo Grade I–II (9.1%) and III–IV (1.6%). The quality assessment of the included literature revealed that all studies were of moderate to high quality. Conclusion: Day-case PCNL represents a safe and viable approach that has seen a growing adoption over recent years, driven in part by post-pandemic healthcare trends. Our review underscores its efficacy, marked by favourable outcomes and a low incidence of complications and readmissions. Moreover, detailed planning is paramount in order to establish clear criteria for potential surgical candidates and indications for inpatient admission, as well as a thorough follow-up plan.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1177/17562872251389084

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-8853-0679
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-6248-6478


Publisher:
SAGE Publications
Journal:
Therapeutic Advances in Urology More from this journal
Volume:
17
Article number:
17562872251389084
Publication date:
2025-10-23
Acceptance date:
2025-10-01
DOI:
EISSN:
1756-2880
ISSN:
1756-2872


Language:
English
Keywords:
Subtype:
Review
Pubs id:
2319804
Local pid:
pubs:2319804
Source identifiers:
3406081
Deposit date:
2025-10-24
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP