Can Researchers Assess the Suitability of Datasets to Answer Their Research Questions, with Access to Metadata Only?

Journal article

ObjectiveThe ability to reproduce the work of others is an essential part of the scientific disciplines. Replicating observational studies using electronic health record (EHR) data can be challenging due to complexities in data access, variations in EHR systems across institutions, and the potential for unaccounted confounding variables. Our aim is to identify the barriers to methods reproducibility for replication studies using EHR data.MethodsWe replicated a study that examined the risk of hospitalisation following a positive COVID-19 test in individuals with diabetes. Using EHR data from the NHS England’s Secure Data Environment (SDE) covering the whole of England, UK (population 57m), we sought to replicate findings from the original study, which used data from Greater Manchester (a large urban region in the UK, population 2.9m). Both analyses were conducted in Trusted Research Environments (TREs) or SDEs, containing linked primary and secondary care data, however methods reproducibility was not straightforward. Differences between the environments that contributed to the difficulties were documented, categorized into themes, and converted into a list of recommendations for TRE/SDEs.ResultsSmall differences between the environments and the data sources led to several challenges in methods reproducibility. Our recommendations of TRE/SDEs should facilitate future replication studies. The recommendations include: a need for improved machine-readable metadata for EHR data; standardization of governance processes to facilitate federated analysis; mandating of code sharing; and for environments to have a support structure for data engineers and analysts. We also propose a new theme for research, “data reproducibility”, as the ability to prepare, extract and clean data from a different database for a replication study.ConclusionEven with perfect code sharing, data reproducibility remains a challenge. Our recommendations have the potential to reduce the barriers to replication studies and therefore enhance the potential of observational studies using EHR data

Authors: Tilston, G; Williams, R; Griffiths, E; Al-Adely, S; Lawson-Tovey, S

• Publication status: Published
• Peer review status: Peer reviewed
• Publisher: IOS Press
• Journal: Studies in Health Technology and Informatics
• Volume: 290
• Pages: 66-70
• Publication date: 2022-06-06
• DOI: 10.3233/shti220033
• ISSN: 0926-9630
• Language: English
• Keywords: Computer science; Biology; Data science; World Wide Web; Ecology; Test (biology); Informatics; Metadata; Information retrieval