Journal article
Prepectoral no mesh versus mesh immediate implant-based reconstruction after mastectomy (Restore-B): a multicentre single-blinded randomised controlled feasibility study protocol
- Abstract:
- Introduction: Breast cancer is common and women requiring mastectomy will be offered a breast reconstruction if they are surgically suitable candidate. Breast reconstruction can be performed at the same time as the mastectomy (immediate) or delayed to a second operation after cancer treatments. The reconstruction can either use the patients’ own tissue to make the breast (autologous) or use a prosthesis to make the breast in the form of a fixed or expandable volume implant (implant-based breast reconstruction, IBBR). Immediate breast reconstruction on top of the chest wall muscles (prepectoral) is performed worldwide. This operation involves the use of a synthetic or biological mesh placed around the implant under the skin. Increasingly, surgeons are performing this technique without the use of mesh. Both techniques, with and without mesh, have not been compared in a head-to-head randomised controlled trial (RCT); therefore, surgeons and patients do not have high quality data to guide their decision making in this area. Methods and analysis: UK-based pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled feasibility trial. The primary aim is to determine the feasibility of a definitive RCT comparing the clinical and cost-effectiveness of no-mesh versus mesh-assisted prepectoral breast reconstruction. Secondary objectives will explore patient understanding of mesh and willingness to be randomised within an RCT; determine if it is possible to collect data to inform a future economic analysis on the use of mesh in breast reconstruction and determine the feasibility of measuring breast biomechanics pre-surgery and post breast reconstruction surgery. Total number of patients to be included: 40 (20 per arm). Ethics and dissemination: This study will be conducted in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical approval has been obtained. Ethics Ref: 23/SC/0302; IRAS Project ID: 301 423. The results of this study will be published in a peer-reviewed medical journal, independent of the results, following the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials standards for RCTs. Trial registration numbers: NCT06112977; ISRCTN17470747.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Version of record, pdf, 483.0KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103278
Authors
- Publisher:
- BMJ Publishing Group
- Journal:
- BMJ Open More from this journal
- Volume:
- 15
- Issue:
- 10
- Article number:
- bmjopen-2025-103278
- Publication date:
- 2025-10-17
- Acceptance date:
- 2025-07-11
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
2044-6055
- ISSN:
-
2044-6055
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
2300333
- Local pid:
-
pubs:2300333
- Source identifiers:
-
3396285
- Deposit date:
-
2025-10-22
- ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.
Terms of use
- Copyright date:
- 2025
- Licence:
- CC Attribution (CC BY)
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record