Journal article icon

Journal article

Dependencies of Simulated Convective Cell and System Growth Biases on Atmospheric Instability and Model Resolution

Abstract:
This study evaluates convective cell properties and their relationships with convective and stratiform rainfall within a season‐long convection‐permitting weather research and forecasting simulation over central Argentina using radar, satellite, and radiosonde measurements from the RELAMPAGO‐CACTI field campaign. The simulation slightly underestimates radar‐estimated rainfall over the ∼3.5‐month evaluation period but underestimates stratiform rainfall by 46% and overestimates convective rainfall by 43%. As convective available potential energy (CAPE) increases, the convective rainfall overestimation decreases, but the stratiform rainfall underestimation increases such that the contribution of convective to total rainfall remains constantly high biased by ∼26%. Overestimated convective rainfall arises from the simulation generating 2.6 times more precipitating convective cells (14,299) than observed by radar (5,662) despite similar observed and simulated cell growth processes, with relatively wide cells contributing mostly to excessive convective rainfall. Relatively shallow cells, typically reaching heights of 4–7 km, contribute most to the cell number bias. This cell number bias increases as CAPE decreases, potentially because cells and their updrafts become narrower and more under‐resolved as CAPE decreases. The gross overproduction of precipitating shallow cells leads to overly efficient precipitation and inadequate detrainment of ice aloft, thereby diminishing the formation of robust stratiform rainfall regions. Decreasing model horizontal grid spacing from 3 to 1 or 0.333 km for low (<300 J kg−1) and high CAPE (>1,000 J kg−1) cases results in minimal change to cell number, depth, and convective‐to‐stratiform partitioning biases. This suggests that improving prediction of these convective properties depends on factors beyond solely increasing model resolution.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1029/2024jd041090

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-3308-6643
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-5926-7154
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-7540-9017
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-5658-2105
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-8489-4763


More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://ror.org/021nxhr62
More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://ror.org/00mmn6b08


Publisher:
American Geophysical Union
Journal:
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres More from this journal
Volume:
129
Issue:
22
Article number:
e2024JD041090
Publication date:
2024-11-22
Acceptance date:
2024-11-03
DOI:
EISSN:
2169-8996
ISSN:
2169-8996, 2169-897X


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
2067564
Local pid:
pubs:2067564
Source identifiers:
2441036
Deposit date:
2024-11-22
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP