Journal article icon

Journal article

Determinants of influenza and pertussis vaccination uptake in pregnancy: A multicenter questionnaire study of pregnant women and healthcare professionals

Abstract:

Introduction:
Uptake rates of antenatal vaccination remain suboptimal. Our aims were to determine (1) the acceptability of routine vaccination among pregnant women, (2) the confidence of maternity healthcare professionals (HCPs) discussing vaccination and (3) HCP opinion regarding the optimum healthcare site for vaccine administration.


Methods:
Separate questionnaires for pregnant women and HCPs were distributed within 4 national health service (NHS) trusts in South England (July 2017 to January 2018).


Results:
Responses from 314 pregnant women and 204 HCPs (18% obstetricians, 75% midwives, 7% unidentified) were analyzed. Previous/intended uptake of influenza and pertussis vaccination was 78% and 92%, respectively. The commonest reason for declining vaccination was feared side effects for their child. White British women (79%) were significantly more accepting of influenza [85% vs. 61%; odds ratio (OR) 3.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.67–6.32] and pertussis vaccination (96% vs. 83%; OR 4.83; 95% CI: 1.77–13.19) compared with nonwhite British women. Among HCPs, 25% were slightly or not at all confident discussing vaccination. Obstetricians felt significantly more confident discussing pertussis vaccination than midwives (68% vs. 55% were very/moderately confident; OR 2.05; 95% CI: 1.02–4.12). Among HCPs, 53%, 25% and 16% thought vaccines should be administered in primary care (general practice), community midwifery and in hospital, respectively.


Conclusion:
Misconceptions exist regarding safety/efficacy of antenatal vaccination, and framing information towards the child’s safety may increase uptake. Education of HCPs is essential, and vaccine promotion should be incorporated into routine antenatal care, with an emphasis on women from ethnic minorities. Administration of vaccines in primary care presents logistical barriers; however, support for alternative sites appears low among HCPs.

Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1097/INF.0000000000002242

Authors


Publisher:
Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins
Journal:
Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal More from this journal
Volume:
38
Issue:
6
Pages:
625-630
Publication date:
2019-06-01
Acceptance date:
2018-10-31
DOI:
EISSN:
1532-0987
ISSN:
0891-3668
Pmid:
30418358


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
pubs:1005564
UUID:
uuid:55af071f-a50c-4ae1-b671-2df9081a7bc1
Local pid:
pubs:1005564
Source identifiers:
1005564
Deposit date:
2019-06-18
ARK identifier:

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP