Journal article icon

Journal article

Singing from manuscripts? Fifteenth-Century, English, secular songs with music and their reading practices

Abstract:
This essay explores the reading practices associated with fifteenth-century manuscripts containing English, secular songs with music, of which only two such manuscripts survive. It addresses the claim that the primary mode of reading was one in which readers sang directly from the manuscripts themselves in performance. This essay challenges this claim by exploring the ways in which the manuscripts themselves suggest alternative models of reading and performance. After dissecting previous critical stances on this subject, this essay begins by discussing the construction of the two manuscripts, examining how the varying contexts and purposes which can be inferred suggest very different uses intended for each manuscript, and hence different reading practices. The second section discusses performance contexts in more depth, analysing the ways in which the physical page both facilitates and complicates a performance directly from the manuscript. In particular I explore the ways in which omissions and apparent deficiencies in the music challenge the view that they were intended to be performed from like modern music. In doing so, I attempt to exonerate scribes from the blame laid on them by some music historians, who see these absences as failures rather than as occurring within the context of a more flexible relationship between page and performance than has been previously thought. By exploring the extent to which the manuscripts in fact point to various possibilities of reading, I argue that both manuscripts suggest that they could have been used for a range of functions, including as a book of songs for rehearsal, a memory-aid in performance, or an archival repository of songs. Overall I argue that these books suggest multiple possible modes of reading and performance in relation to the physical page, and hence that the reading practices of fifteenth-century musical manuscripts were more diverse than has previously been suggested.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
HUMS
Department:
English Faculty
Oxford college:
Exeter College
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-0950-6676


Publisher:
Durham University Department of English Studies
Journal:
Postgraduate English: A Journal and Forum for Postgraduates in English More from this journal
Volume:
33
Publication date:
2017-01-31
Acceptance date:
2017-01-01
ISSN:
1756-9761


Keywords:
Pubs id:
pubs:822992
UUID:
uuid:5534676d-a9c8-4f7b-a8cf-a3be59ea2415
Local pid:
pubs:822992
Source identifiers:
822992
Deposit date:
2018-02-06
ARK identifier:

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP