Conference item
The king is naked: On the notion of robustness for natural language processing
- Abstract:
- There is growing evidence that the classical notion of adversarial robustness originally introduced for images has been adopted as a de facto standard by a large part of the NLP research community. We show that this notion is problematic in the context of NLP as it considers a narrow spectrum of linguistic phenomena. In this paper, we argue for semantic robustness, which is better aligned with the human concept of linguistic fidelity. We characterize semantic robustness in terms of biases that it is expected to induce in a model. We study semantic robustness of a range of vanilla and robustly trained architectures using a template-based generative test bed. We complement the analysis with empirical evidence that, despite being harder to implement, semantic robustness can improve performance %gives guarantees for on complex linguistic phenomena where models robust in the classical sense fail.
- Publication status:
- Published
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 1.2MB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1609/aaai.v36i10.21353
Authors
- Publisher:
- Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence
- Journal:
- Proceedings of the Thirty-Sixth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence More from this journal
- Volume:
- 36
- Issue:
- 10
- Pages:
- 11047-11057
- Publication date:
- 2022-06-28
- Acceptance date:
- 2021-12-01
- DOI:
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
1225016
- Local pid:
-
pubs:1225016
- Deposit date:
-
2021-12-15
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (www.aaai.org)
- Copyright date:
- 2022
- Rights statement:
- Copyright © 2022, Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (www.aaai.org). All rights reserved.
- Notes:
-
This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available from Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence at https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v36i10.21353
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record