Journal article icon

Journal article

Haptic Compensation in Blind People's Conceptual Representations

Abstract:
Vision is typically dominant in our perception of the world. Such asymmetry is also observed in conceptual representations. This could be driven by perceptual experience or learned from other input, such as language. In this study we tested the role of direct perceptual experience in conceptual representation by investigating the sensory underpinnings of word meanings in blind and sighted individuals. Seventeen early-blind and 17 matched sighted Dutch native speakers rated 100 Dutch nouns for their sensory associations across six modalities (vision, audition, haptic, interoception, gustation, and olfaction) on a 0 (not at all) to 5 (very much) scale. To cover a range of concepts we used five semantic categories thought to be strongly associated with different sensory modalities: animals (vision), instruments (audition), tactile objects (haptics), food (gustation), and odor objects (olfaction). We found no difference between blind and sighted individuals in their ratings of visual associations, suggesting that conceptual associations with vision can be learned indirectly via means beyond direct visual perception. However, blind participants did associate concepts more strongly with haptics than sighted participants for all semantic categories except animals. This is evidence for crossmodal compensation in conceptual representation, in line with enhanced tactile acuity reported elsewhere for blind individuals. Overall, the results point to a role for perceptual experience in conceptual representation, but suggest there are other strategies that can be recruited to learn about perception, supporting hybrid models of semantic representation.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1162/opmi.a.250

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Experimental Psychology
Sub department:
Experimental Psychology
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Experimental Psychology
Sub department:
Experimental Psychology
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Experimental Psychology
Sub department:
Experimental Psychology
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-0132-216X


Publisher:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press
Journal:
Open Mind More from this journal
Volume:
9
Pages:
1786-1801
Publication date:
2025-10-17
Acceptance date:
2025-09-15
DOI:
EISSN:
2470-2986
ISSN:
2470-2986
Pmid:
41246214


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
2327306
UUID:
uuid_516b0088-063e-4815-9eac-5c7b0dade162
Local pid:
pubs:2327306
Source identifiers:
3504199
Deposit date:
2025-11-25
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP