Journal article
ELBW and ELGAN outcomes in developing nations – systematic review and meta-analysis
- Abstract:
-
Context
Morbidity and mortality amongst extremely low birth weight (ELBW) and extremely low gestational age neonates (ELGANs) in developing nations has not been well studied.
Objectives
Evaluate survival until discharge, short- and long-term morbidities of ELBW and ELGANs in LMICs.
Data sources
CENTRAL, EMBASE, MEDLINE and Web of Science.
Study selection
Prospective and retrospective observational studies were included.
Data extraction and synthesis
Four authors extracted data independently. Random-effects meta-analysis of proportions was used to synthesize data, modified QUIPS scale to evaluate quality of studies and GRADE approach to ascertain the certainty of evidence (CoE).
Results
192 studies enrolling 22,278 ELBW and 18,338 ELGANs were included. Survival was 34% (95% CI: 31% - 37%) (CoE–low) for ELBW and 39% (34% - 44%) (CoE—moderate) for ELGANs. For ELBW neonates, the survival for low-income (LI), lower middle-income (LMI) and upper middle income (UMI) countries was 18% (11% - 28%), 28% (21% - 35%) and 39% (36% - 42%), respectively. For ELGANs, it was 13% (8% - 20%) for LI, 28% (21% - 36%) for LMI and 48% (42% - 53%) for UMI countries. There was no difference in survival between two epochs: 2000–2009 and 2010–2020. Except for necrotising enterocolitis [ELBW and ELGANs—8% (7% - 10%)] and periventricular leukomalacia [ELBW—7% (4% - 11%); ELGANs—6% (5%-7%)], rates of all other morbidities were higher compared to developed nations. Rates of neurodevelopmental impairment was 17% (7% - 34%) in ELBW neonates and 29% (23% - 37%) in ELGANs.
Limitations
CoE was very low to low for all secondary outcomes.
Conclusions
Mortality and morbidity amongst ELBW and ELGANs is still a significant burden in LMICs. CoE was very low to low for all the secondary outcomes, emphasizing the need for high quality prospective cohort studies.
Trial registration
PROSPERO (CRD42020222873).
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Version of record, pdf, 1.5MB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0255352
Authors
- Publisher:
- Public Library of Science
- Journal:
- PLoS One More from this journal
- Volume:
- 16
- Issue:
- 8
- Article number:
- e0255352
- Publication date:
- 2021-08-05
- Acceptance date:
- 2021-07-28
- DOI:
- ISSN:
-
1932-6203
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
1189710
- Local pid:
-
pubs:1189710
- Deposit date:
-
2021-08-05
- ARK identifier:
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Ramaswamy et al.
- Copyright date:
- 2021
- Rights statement:
- ©2021 Ramaswamy et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
- Licence:
- CC Attribution (CC BY)
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record