Journal article
Nonconformity and socialism: the case of J. G. Greenhough, 1880–1914
- Abstract:
- This article examines the life, thought and activism of the prominent Baptist minister John Gershom Greenhough. Existing scholarly and popular narratives generally focus on the key role played by Nonconformity in nurturing the labour movement in late Victorian and Edwardian Britain. Using Greenhough as a case study this article posits an alternative interpretation of this relationship, contending that the individualistic religious culture of Nonconformity was often deeply hostile to socialism. This hostility motivated Greenhough, and others like him, to abandon their historical allegiance to the Liberal party in the early twentieth century in favour of the Conservatives. More broadly, this article investigates the process of political and ideological conversion and challenges dominant historical readings that characterize anti-socialism as being synonymous with middle-class economic self-interest.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 915.8KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1111/1468-2281.12285
Authors
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- Journal:
- Historical Research More from this journal
- Volume:
- 92
- Issue:
- 258
- Pages:
- 771-789
- Publication date:
- 2019-10-09
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1468-2281
- ISSN:
-
0950-3471
- Language:
-
English
- Pubs id:
-
2398235
- Local pid:
-
pubs:2398235
- Source identifiers:
-
W2976259118
- Deposit date:
-
2026-04-14
- ARK identifier:
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Institute of Historical Research
- Copyright date:
- 2019
- Rights statement:
- © 2019 Institute of Historical Research. This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model).
- Notes:
- This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available online from Oxford University Press at https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-2281.12285
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record