Journal article icon

Journal article

Heat band, rain band and heat low migration: process-based evaluation of some CMIP6 GCMs over West Africa

Abstract:
Poor air quality and precipitation change are strong, rapidly changing, and possibly linked drivers of physical hazards in sub-Saharan Africa. Future projections of sub-Saharan air quality and precipitation remain uncertain due to differences in model representations of aerosol, aerosol–precipitation interactions, and unclear future aerosol emission pathways. In this study, we evaluate the performance of CMIP6 models in simulating PM2.5, aerosol optical depth (AOD), and precipitation over Africa relative to a range of observational and re- analysis products, including novel observational datasets, over the 1981–2023 period. While models accurately capture the seasonal cycle of PM2.5 concentrations over most regions, the concentration magnitudes show strong intermodel diversity. Dust AOD shows a generally accurate seasonal spatial distribution, with multi-model mean (MMM) pattern correlation coefficients within 0.77–0.94, despite strong intermodel diversity in magnitude. Sea- sonal spatial patterns of non-dust AOD are poorly represented, with MMM pattern correlation coefficients of 0.25–0.58 and the poorest performance during September through November. Emission inventory inaccuracies may explain systematic biases for non-dust AOD fields, with differences in circulation and precipitation patterns, as well as aerosol treatment causing intermodel diversity. The magnitude and annual progression of precipitation over both the east and west African monsoon regions are well captured, though there is poorer performance in simulating the east African monsoon. Biases found relate to the intertropical convergence zone, more apparent over east Africa, and rainfall magnitude, more apparent over west Africa. This evaluation highlights strong in- termodel diversity in the representation of African air quality and climate and identifies model performance over sub-Saharan Africa and the reasons behind the biases as critical gaps to address for improving confidence in climate projections
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1007/s00382-023-06930-4
Publication website:
https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/124389/1/acp-25-10523-2025.pdf

Authors

More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-0686-2827
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-5738-1092
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-9136-8972
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-9675-7961


Publisher:
Springer
Journal:
Climate Dynamics More from this journal
Volume:
62
Issue:
1
Pages:
791-806
Publication date:
2023-09-07
DOI:
EISSN:
1432-0894
ISSN:
0930-7575


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
1529475
Local pid:
pubs:1529475
Source identifiers:
W4386499026
Deposit date:
2026-05-17
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP