Journal article icon

Journal article

Throwing Out the Bathwater but Keeping the Baby: Extending Campbell-Fiske’s Multitrait-Multimethod Framework

Abstract:
The 65th anniversary of Campbell and Fiske’s multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) framework provides a timely opportunity to revisit and modernize this foundational model for construct validation. Although structural-equation-modeling-based MTMM approaches have enhanced the field, their widespread application remains constrained by convergence problems, ambiguous trait-method distinctions, and a lack of consensus regarding optimal model specifications. We propose an extended Campbell-Fiske framework that resolves these limitations while preserving the original guidelines’ conceptual strengths. Our key innovation is to apply the MTMM logic to a fully latent multitrait-multidomain correlation matrix derived from a rigorously tested multiple-indicator measurement model. Our approach treats traits and methods (i.e., domains, occasions, informants, contexts, or another method facet) as fully symmetrical, substantive facets, eliminates reliance on manifest correlations, corrects for measurement error, and introduces formal asymptotic parameter comparisons to test each validity criterion. This framework provides a formatively heuristic structure that retains the original appeal of the MTMM logic for applied research while meeting current psychometric standards for transparency, reproducibility, and inferential rigor expected by leading academic journals. We illustrate the method using a large, multidimensional data set (N = 18,047), but the framework generalizes across domains of psychological science. The extended framework offers applied researchers a flexible, powerful tool for evaluating convergent and discriminant validity, diagnosing trait-domain interactions, and clarifying measurement quality. By “keeping the baby” while refreshing the empirical implementation, our approach affirms the enduring value of the Campbell-Fiske logic while aligning it with the demands of modern research practice.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1177/25152459251407652

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-1078-9717
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-2102-803X
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-9744-3059
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-4489-3827


Publisher:
SAGE Publications
Journal:
Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science More from this journal
Volume:
9
Issue:
2
Article number:
25152459251407652
Publication date:
2026-06-15
Acceptance date:
2025-10-17
DOI:
EISSN:
2515-2459
ISSN:
2515-2467


Language:
English
Keywords:
Source identifiers:
4234094
Deposit date:
2026-06-16
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP